Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If it took half an hour to get a decision out of it it would still be helping the ref but wouldn’t be a good thing.

It must destroy the buzz of scoring a goal for the matchgoing fan, who has no idea what is being reviewed. It’s fine for you telly clappers ****ing into your Doritos but for actual fans at the game it’s nonsense.

If it absolutely has to happen, there needs to be a 30 second time limit. If they can’t overturn it before then you stick with the on-field decision.

Said for a long time that there should be a 20-30 second limit. If nothing is found in that time then it's simply not clear and obvious.

And yes it is **** at the match and no you can't celebrate goals the same anymore.
 
I can understand why a LFC fan wouldn't want VAR, how many yellow card will you get instead opf penalties? At the end of the day if it wasn't for players like Salah and Stevie Me trying to cheat every 5 seconds, there would've been no need for VAR.

Wow, another one who thinks Gerrard still plays for us.
 
I can understand why a LFC fan wouldn't want VAR, how many yellow card will you get instead opf penalties? At the end of the day if it wasn't for players like Salah and Stevie Me trying to cheat every 5 seconds, there would've been no need for VAR.

Oh here we go with the tedious 'it will stop cheating' nonsense when if anything it will make it worse knowing that any sort of touch being watched in slow mo will result in a penalty will be given.

The world cup showed it won't stop cheating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
If it took half an hour to get a decision out of it it would still be helping the ref but wouldn’t be a good thing.

It must destroy the buzz of scoring a goal for the matchgoing fan, who has no idea what is being reviewed. It’s fine for you telly clappers ****ing into your Doritos but for actual fans at the game it’s nonsense.

If it absolutely has to happen, there needs to be a 30 second time limit. If they can’t overturn it before then you stick with the on-field decision.

It will all become part of the game, as it has in rugby.

Are things perfect at these early stages?

No.

Are things likely to improve, over time, practice and patience?

Almost certainly.
 
Said for a long time that there should be a 20-30 second limit. If nothing is found in that time then it's simply not clear and obvious.

And yes it is **** at the match and no you can't celebrate goals the same anymore.

Non VAR decisions often take much longer than 20-30:seconds for play to resume <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
It will all become part of the game, as it has in rugby.

Are things perfect at these early stages?

No.

Are things likely to improve, over time, practice and patience?

Almost certainly.

It's been about 7 months since it was first used, has it improved at all? NO! Hawkeye is used in a number of ways in a number of sports and has been successful so use it in football and bin VAR.
 
The broken monitor thing is funny as **** and taking 4 mins to make a decision lol. It's **** and I'm sick of hearing how it will get better, how long has it been around now? 2 years?

The fundamental flaw is sticking to the idea of the ref in the middle being an infallible god who must oversee everything personally. That means everything must stop rather than him just getting extra info being fed in his ear. It also means the guy making the decision is still the one subject to all the player/crowd pressure judging things in context rather than just applying the rules to a monitor. Useless for fixing PGMOL's problems, but that's the point of it.
 
If it took half an hour to get a decision out of it it would still be helping the ref but wouldn’t be a good thing.

It must destroy the buzz of scoring a goal for the matchgoing fan, who has no idea what is being reviewed. It’s fine for you telly clappers ****ing into your Doritos but for actual fans at the game it’s nonsense.

If it absolutely has to happen, there needs to be a 30 second time limit. If they can’t overturn it before then you stick with the on-field decision.
They don't give a **** about match going fans mate. The armchairs will always get their way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
Oh here we go with the tedious 'it will stop cheating' nonsense when if anything it will make it worse knowing that any sort of touch being watched in slow mo will result in a penalty will be given.

The world cup showed it won't stop cheating.
They go down with contact anyway, but, the Gerrards & Ronaldos, who went/go to ground with NO contact will no longer win penalties, they will rightly get punished instead. Grappling at corners will end, hopefully GK obstruction will go too.
It's still new, it will take time for operators to understand how to judge something in slo-mo, it won't be 100%, but it'll be a damned sight better than having 3 men in black trying to keep up with 22 highly trained athletes and see every thing perfectly. Some decisions take longer than others, but I bet if you added up all the time VAR took and compared it to how muh time players wasted time trying to get others booked, it would be far less.
You luddites would still be living in caves in animal skins because 'ooh, the roof leaks sometimes' 'oh, the cloth wears too quicky'. Always looking problems as an excuse to stay where you are, rather thanprogress. Always lookin back rather than forward.
 
It seems that it is the referee decisions that are overturned that take more time. The reason for that should be quite obvious to everybody. Much of last night’s delays were because the players, from both teams, were surrounding the ref. Let the officials do their job and then get on with it. The first penalty was an obvious mistake, judging from the TV angle, but maybe not from the refs view. The second one VAR just confirmed that the ref was correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoddle is a god
They don't give a **** about match going fans mate. The armchairs will always get their way.

I've probably watched as much live footie as anyone on here .... I'm all for VAR if it comes up with the right decision ... which it will more so than match day officials without it <ok>