leave her there

It's a hard one to be sure.

I just think the govts motives are a bit suss. It feels like a cop out on their part for me.

The rule of law should apply imho, uncomfortable as that maybe for some

 

But if , IF , part of our law is we can legally stop her coming back , that’s fine by me . Anyway , off to read something .

As has been mentioned , nice to see people sharing views without it getting nasty .

Ttfn

 

It’s a very scary thought Fan, far too scary to take a risk. It’s clear that her ideology sits comfortably inside her head and this will not diminish as a result of living elsewhere.

 

Agreed, prison isn’t what it used to be nowadays and prisoners have easy access to the outside world. Plus of course there’s the burden on the taxpayer to consider too.

 

Well well well, I'm watching the press preview on sky news and they are discussing the whole "you are no longer British" headlines

The political consultant Nina schlick (wid by the way) has said that as it stands becoming an isis bride is not currently prosecutable under British law.

So she is technically "innocent" as it stands, as in no laws broken. No argument against that from the newspaper bloke whose stand is same as those on here saying they are happy if she simply isn't allowed back, or the news reader dude


Only going by what's being discussed here on sky news. not sure if any legal eagles can clarify??

 

Fan, she’s not coming home bro, let this one go.

 

Excellent news.

Wet liberals and terrorist sympathisers across the country are weeping this morning!

 

QUOTE="Tel, post: 12581457, member: 1008347"]Fan, she’s not coming home bro, let this one go.[/QUOTE]
He can't quite grasp that. I hear what he's saying but she's going to have to settle for a mansion in sunny Bangladesh.

 

Are you seriously trying to create equivalence between a 15 yr old being indoctrinated online and then travelling half way around the globe to join a twisted death cult and getting married underage within 3 weeks of landing......

To schoolkids choosing to protest about climate change, as it’ll affect their futures? Really?

Using your ‘logic’ you can dismiss any future underage sex cases for 15 year olds, if they decide to do drugs, yeah that’s their choice, prostitution? Yeah no bother, personal choice innit. Go give you head a ****ing wobble.

 

He can't quite grasp that. I hear what he's saying but she's going to have to settle for a mansion in sunny Bangladesh.[/QUOTE]

Quite. I cant understand why she would want to come back here when she could live like a queen in Bangladesh for a fiver a year...

 

Yeah suck it up Libs

Take that MAGA inspired ****e and ram it up your arse mate

 

She's not broken any laws. She's only given birth to a little jihadi. Her words not mine.

 

This is an interesting point, how can we deport foreign criminals if other countries start disowning them?

 

Michael Heaver would look fitting in a Nazi Uniform.

 

You know that's not real right?

 

Yup, the U.K. govt has just shown other countries how to do it. Going to cause a **** storm.

 

That's nonsense, nobody wanted her to get away with this people just wanted the letter of the law applied, now if there is a legal way for her to removed as a UK citizen then fine. Branding people terrorist sympathisers because they don't want to become some kind of watered down version of ISIS is a low blow.

 

This is going to cause the biggest shhite storm ever, I think even the British Media are starting to run scared of it, knowing Sajid Javid has fooked up big time, not forgetting he was born to parents of Pakistani descent - he better hope he never commits a crime

 

Haha too easy

 

Have you got a MAKE BRITAIN GREAT AGAIN cap mate?