if you subscribe to the exponentially expanding universe at different speeds in different directions, ie mainstream science, how do you explain the constant position of stars relative to us over thousands of years?
It’s all relative iirc
if you subscribe to the exponentially expanding universe at different speeds in different directions, ie mainstream science, how do you explain the constant position of stars relative to us over thousands of years?
NASA admit that they no longer have the technology to go back to the moon .We do, it's called scientific evidence.
the original footage is a recording of a recording
NASA admit that they no longer have the technology to go back to the moon .
telemetry data
Telemetry is an automated communications process by which measurements and other data are collected at remote or inaccessible points and transmitted to receiving equipment for monitoring.
Basically they only ACTUAL evidence of an object going to the moon
thats not info posted on forums, if you actually clicked on a video once in while instead of sitcking your fingers in yours ears and shouting la la la la, you would know that NASA has said this on camera, Don Petit iirc
NASA employee Don Pettit
You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

Ha ha ha yes Dev , the NASA employee was an astranoutHe was an Astronaut![]()



Worth a punt, kinda figured they wouldn't understand though.
Glass spherules actually, and they can only have come from the moon. Plus the 50 years worth of other evidence. Pretty compelling.
This particular piece of flim flammery reminds me of the 9/11 passport as evidence argument![]()
not if it was filmed on earth
Apparently its quite windy on the moon.