Transfer rumours: Lallana could join Gerrard at Rangers
they can't afford that.
Transfer rumours: Lallana could join Gerrard at Rangers

True but at least theirs expire in the summer.And Moreno, and Sturridge.
We do need some back-up.At least this time we are tying players down to long contracts who deserve it.
Sorry migs![]()
Isnt that what you use youth for and hope one day good enough to step up.We do need some back-up.
I wouldn't go that far. He's not the standard that we need, which is why we upgraded, but he's ok as back up in case of emergency.Isnt that what you use youth for and hope one day good enough to step up.
Migs is a liability and always has been. Why would youth be any worst.
But how do you know you have better until you give them a chance?I wouldn't go that far. He's not the standard that we need, which is why we upgraded, but he's ok as back up in case of emergency.
Do you know any of the younger lads would do better? It's all very well watching players at a lower level or in training, but Karius is a prime example of not knowing what you're going to get until they actually have an extended run under pressure.
I'm a firm believer in keeping what you have until you know you have better.
We may not know much about them until they break out but I'm sure the manager and his team have a good idea.But how do you know you have better until you give them a chance?
Young keepers can get better migs wont.
Also not goalie related but taa and robertson is an example of youngsters given a chance to prove themselves.
don't want to sound argumentative but that argument is quite easy to counter.We may not know much about them until they break out but I'm sure the manager and his team have a good idea.
If they decide to keep Mig it's because they think that, for now at least, he's the best option. If we have better then I'm sure we'd be seeing them on the bench.
True enough but surely the dilemma is you wouldn't learn anything of his ability at the higher level if he was literally "sitting on the bench". Which with Alisson in the 1st team he would be.don't want to sound argumentative but that argument is quite easy to counter.
you have a decent young keeper with potential and want to put him on bench but cant get rid of migs as he is on reasonable wages what do you do?
simple, you keep him in youth team as you are paying migs lots of money and cant get rid, so you end up with no idea if he could make it as don't give him the opportunity.
yes i get the argument he stays in youth team as getting game time, but it is a dif level and never know if be good enough unless you take that chance.
thats why you use the caricao cup or whatever it is called and fa cup to see if good enough to step up. we use migs for that and he don't work, so whats the loss.True enough but surely the dilemma is you wouldn't learn anything of his ability at the higher level if he was literally "sitting on the bench". Which with Alisson in the 1st team he would be.
Agreed. Better than nothing I guess but when the Number 1 goalkeeper is so good it can be a problem. I have no stats here but I suppose it is the reason clubs mainly buy proven goalkeepers.thats why you use the caricao cup or whatever it is called and fa cup to see if good enough to step up. we use migs for that and he don't work, so whats the loss.