I think we need to go easy on Milner for a few games because I have a feeling we're going to need him in the back line when it comes to the crunch.
thats why i was surprised and a little disappointed we didn't play same team that played Bournemouth. he could have been rested for this and we may have had a fit taa. midfield got changed same as defence with milner, so is keita, fab and shaq going to play against scum? why i was confused by setup to be honest.
personally think it will be Keita ,Fab, Hendo as like Saint i think Milner will be playing FB in the near future.
but wasn't it only a few days ago he was saying about tying him down to a contract for Lyon? he seems to talk about us more than his own fecking club
i haven't watched it myself, i just remember a comment he made a few days ago about tying fekir down to lyon and now this!!
Its about more than the Fekir stuff, but one thing that stood out was Fekirs knee op a year or two back. Apparently the graft/tissue that was used was sourced from a corpse and this stands a chance of deteriorating more quickly than being taken from a living person. Maybe one of the reasons we pulled out.
i have heard different. we pulled out because of calamity karius, it was decided by klopp that we needed allison and couldn't afford both allison and fekir, why we went for shaq as cheaper alternative to fekir.
It's not my area of expertise, but I'm guessing most organ donors are dead. This seems a more plausible explanation - but I'm sure the reason given was medical.
This was just a bit of tissue though, that is normally taken from a living person. Who knows?.....the deal is dead in the water anyway
I was being flippant, but my point was that most transplants come from a dead host anyway, so I didn't realise that that affected the quality of the donated material. Presumably the tissue would have been taken very soon after death before any necrosis sets in. As I said, not my area of expertise - so I might be talking nonsense. Now there's an open goal for someone.
