yes but i disagree with the "clear" interpretation as it is only clear with review , freeze frame and questionable tech.
Dismisses dissenting opinions as a "conspiracy theory" in spite of actual evidence backing them up ✔️ Because there's evidence backing up the points they're addressing, ignore those and start pointing the finger ✔️ Believing that waffling about some revisionist history is relevant to the argument, rather than make them look like a loon ✔️ Conveniently forgets moments that obliterate their view, i.e. Gerrard's dive for a penalty in the 2005 final which Smicer slotted in the rebound ✔️ Thinks that they're being funny, but they just sound arsey ✔️ Has somebody with just as little to add to the conversation mindlessly agreeing with their babble ✔️ I thought Liverpudlians didn't like Boris Johnson, so why are you doing your best impression of him?
My mistake: it was Xabi Alonso who scored from the rebound after Gerrard dived - an incident you conspicuously failed to try and defend, which is par for the course with you lot...
You had plenty of German officials along the way though, giving their countryman Klopp the `benefit of doubt`.
not much point in defending anything about our club to you though is there since you see only the worse .In fact if i had defended the refs decision you would have bitched about that. You lot really need to get a new hobby - perhaps you could take up DIY to try and get your ground filled finished sometime in my lifetime.
No, there is no point defending how your club captain dived for a penalty in a Champions League final which directly led to the score becoming 3-3 on the night, you know why? Because that would be you defending one of your players cheating to gain an advantage - and you couldn't do that because you've spent the afternoon accusing Spurs players of diving in an obvious attempt to change the subject, which shows that you fail to understand that when one of your players is accused of diving, accusing another team's players of diving doesn't exonerate them from anything, it's just trying to change the subject because you know full well that staying on the subject will prove your players dived. Maybe you need to get a new hobby, because impersonating Boris Johnson on a Spurs message board isn't particularly lucrative.
I don't come on here very much, but if I didn't know I was on the spuds board, I'd swear blind I was on the utd one. The levels of bile are unbelievable
That's funny, the lengths you lot go to in order to deny the ****ehousery your team is routinely guilty of while pointing the finger at everyone else sounds EXACTLY like the worst kind of Man Utd fans But don't let a little thing like that get in the way of your Narrative
As measurements of "levels" go : delusion + entitlement >> bile. But those measurements could change (next year ... ) .
I don't believe I'm deluded, and I don't think I'm entitled to anything. I don't think the team I support do either. By the way, 'delusion' was a term frequently used on the utd board. That was of course when there were actually 'supporters' posting on there. Now, it's lifeless, and they're playing us on Sunday. I think the cliche that applies in their case is 'plastic'
How are the Spuds feeling today after joining "European royalty" Liverpool in the knockout stages? Will spurs do something in the CL this year or just make up the numbers? Well done anyways lads please log in to view this image
Avatar, name and sig bet for the whole of next season that you don't win the CL or league this season? Chance for revenge Sucky...have a think about it
Sure, but the same goes for you and the Spuds, if none of us do win either the board decides both our fates next season. Where's ya stones dickhead?