Your entire argument is based on your belief of what other people are thinking. people who willlknow what they are thinking a damn sight better than you do. that type of argument is never going to convince somebody.
I'm sorry, but the government can ignore a vote. its very easy,. they just don't do anything. so now that arguments been proven to be factually wrong. what have you got? nothing.
i was hoping you would at least say try and look at if from the other side. because i have done so as the american gun control has this exact issue. they need a super majority to enforce gun controls. should every american with a gun be forced to sell it and ged rid in a decision that could be overturned the next day? i had a hard think about it but my answer is no. americans need to have a firm decision before making the choice that will have a large affect on hundreds of millions of americans that cant easily be undone. so i think america is right that they need a supermajority to change their gun control laws. i think it is too high but thats another matter.
same goes here.
so i am not ignoring the vote i have thought long and hard about it researching the problem in other countries even before coming up with a solution while you are burying your head in the sand relying on an argument that is clearly not even true, especially to me when youre trying to tell me what im thinking!