Not sure your point?
Talk to yourself was if you ban everyone ok? The rest of the statement is how I see it ok?
Not sure your point?
They call a people’s vote and either get it done before March 29th or apply for an A50 extension.how do they stop it ?
Yep.
One of his mates is Crispin Odey. The odious Odey admitted to clearing £220m on the night of the referendum result, when good old Nige played his part in the biggest currency short in U.K. history. Odey allowed Moggs first fund to open under his own funds umbrella. Odey has access to Downing Street. Odey made another wedge yesterday shorting the **** out of the pound again as Ministers resignations went in......
Moggs old man wrote a book called The Sovereign Individual, which gives a cracking insight into his ideology.
We're allowed to leave and there would be two options for it in the poll that you're calling the destruction of democracy. It's just a **** idea.
Talk to yourself was if you ban everyone ok? The rest of the statement is how I see it ok?


My brother is quite good at that stuff. I saw him the day after the referendum result and said that it was a disaster. His reply was that it was brilliant as he’d made a small fortune overnight from taking a position on the GBP based on a gamble that Leave would win! He probably did the same yesterday, he’s unlikely to tell me as we’ve agreed Brexit is a subject we shouldn’t really discuss anymore! At least my kid brother is a [HASHTAG]#Remainernow[/HASHTAG]Yep.
One of his mates is Crispin Odey. The odious Odey admitted to clearing £220m on the night of the referendum result, when good old Nige played his part in the biggest currency short in U.K. history. Odey allowed Moggs first fund to open under his own funds umbrella. Odey has access to Downing Street. Odey made another wedge yesterday shorting the **** out of the pound again as Ministers resignations went in......
Moggs old man wrote a book called The Sovereign Individual, which gives a cracking insight into his ideology.
Because...?If it included the remain option, yes.
Because...?
Three options and preferential voting. How's that the death of democracy? You're just repeatedly stating that it is, but not why.
Selfish ****s. Pete;s sat there with a hard on and armed with 548 tweets. And you ****ers are all on here.
Mind i'm still non the wiser on what is best.

can you see the present Govt doing that because i can't and i fail to see how any new Govt would have enough time to do it.They call a people’s vote and either get it done before March 29th or apply for an A50 extension.
A second vote that was a straight choice between no deal and Mays deal would make it a vote that half of the country would swerve completely.If it included the remain option, yes.
It’s like having another GE.Because you haven't carried out the democracy of the first referendum result, it's a bit like voting Tory at a GE and saying hey scrap that people, we are putting Labour into power instead. I can't think of any democratic result where the result wasn't fulfilled in the UK.
That's the fault of the first referendum and the intentionally misleading leave campaigns.Because you haven't carried out the democracy of the first referendum result, it's a bit like voting Tory at a GE and saying hey scrap that people, we are putting Labour into power instead. I can't think of any democratic result where the result wasn't fulfilled in the UK.


A second vote that was a straight choice between no deal and Mays deal would make it a vote that half of the country would swerve completely.
I was largely against the idea of a second vote until recently, as the vote was Leave and my view was that we should leave in the least damaging way possible and fulfil the vote. The exception being a complete impasse in Parliament.
However, since all of the stuff about Banks came out I’ve changed my mind. A man who supposedly gave £8m of his own cash to a political campaign and yet lives in a £900k house with a £500k mortgage just doesn’t add up. The ties between, him Farage, Trump, Bannon and the Ruskis is quite suspicious to say the least. Wherever the money came from it wasn’t his, so therefore that campaign was bent. The margin of victory was a 700k swing and that cash will have had an impact. As the Ashcroft poll after the vote clearly showed that a large chunk of voters only made their minds up in days running up to the vote or in the day itself. Therefore the result isn’t secure anyway imo, and so a second vote now would be justified anyway imo.
A 2 stage question would be my choice.
1. Do you want to accept the deal to leave the EU - yes or no.
2. In the event the result is no, then would you choose to leave the EU with no deal or Remain in the EU?
That's the fault of the first referendum and the intentionally misleading leave campaigns.
Imagine if a general election was held and there were two choices, Conservative and Not Conservative.
The Not Conservative promoters all suggest that this could mean Labour, Lib Dem or some mixture of the two and definitely not The BNP.
The Tories tell everyone that a vote against them would be disastrous and that anyone could get in if it's not them.
The Not Conservatives win and a BNP government is proposed. Why should that result stand?
It’s like having another GE.
There was less time in between the last two GE than there would be between two referendums if we had the second one now.
There's a difference between misleading and intentionally bullshitting so that you can personally profit while ****ing over the country.Oh come on! You trying to tell me politicians are upstanding and honest people who never tell lies. Misleading, that's every politicians middle name!