Match Day Thread Premier League, Cups & Euro Watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Result...

  • Home win

  • Draw

  • Away win

Results are only viewable after voting.
More details on Ronaldo story.


Woman in question had hospital examination day after and reported to police but refused to say who did it.

Given a settlement was agreed with a non disclosure.... well..

I am wondering a DNA sample was secured?
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
More details on Ronaldo story.


Woman in question had hospital examination day after and reported to police but refused to say who did it.

Given a settlement was agreed with a non disclosure.... well..

I am wondering a DNA sample was secured?
Click to expand...

It happened in Nevada and their rape law states that provided an incident is reported within 4 years of it happening it never becomes statute barred. If the case is strong enough, and apparently her original lawyer has letters from Ronaldo, or his lawyer, relating to the incident, then Ronaldo could be extradited to stand trial in the US.
 
Just nicked this quote from another thread.

"She said stop or no several times. She said that she doesn't want to, but she has made herself available. Afterwards I apologized. But she never screamed."

That was Ronaldo's defence in 2009, at least according to Der Spiegel.

If there's any truth in that he should be behind bars.
 
Garlic Klopp said:
It happened in Nevada and their rape law states that provided an incident is reported within 4 years of it happening it never becomes statute barred. If the case is strong enough, and apparently her original lawyer has letters from Ronaldo, or his lawyer, relating to the incident, then Ronaldo could be extradited to stand trial in the US.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm letters as in admissions or offers of hush money with no admissions....

I presume it will end up in a massive pay off.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
More details on Ronaldo story.


Woman in question had hospital examination day after and reported to police but refused to say who did it.

Given a settlement was agreed with a non disclosure.... well..

I am wondering a DNA sample was secured?
Click to expand...

Yeah apparently her lawyer says his lawyers already broke terms of the agreement which is why they felt confident cooperating for the piece.

Read the journos defence of the piece on Twitter. Cited literally hundreds of documents, multiple cooberating sources. Refuted with evidence each claim so far made by his side. Also pointed out that his lawyers have not actually denied the points of the piece but kept saying it was an invasion of his privacy....strange line to take ...
 
FSG's Last Stand said:
Just nicked this quote from another thread.

"She said stop or no several times. She said that she doesn't want to, but she has made herself available. Afterwards I apologized. But she never screamed."

That was Ronaldo's defence in 2009, at least according to Der Spiegel.

If there's any truth in that he should be behind bars.
Click to expand...

Defence or deposition? In any event if someone said that to police in a statement they would be found guilty in court in a heartbeat.
 
FSG's Last Stand said:
Just nicked this quote from another thread.

"She said stop or no several times. She said that she doesn't want to, but she has made herself available. Afterwards I apologized. But she never screamed."

That was Ronaldo's defence in 2009, at least according to Der Spiegel.

If there's any truth in that he should be behind bars.
Click to expand...

It's his response in a legal questionnaire (his lawyers) DS got a copy of the email. Apparently at some point they tried to replace it with a new version where he doesn't admit to everything....
 
Seems to me that it's wierd this came out in Germany and the first thing wasn't an arrest.

Why did it end up as a story in a paper??

Anyway. He could lose everything here worse than tiger woods.
 
FSG's Last Stand said:
So, the police failed to act on his own admission of guilt?
Click to expand...
Don't think the police saw that originally. It was internal correspondence between him and his lawyers..... the journos got it somehow.

DS journo saying she acted on advice of her lawyer at time to deal... turned out he specialised in mortgages or something not this type of thing. Her claim is she thought she'd get slaughtered by his fans etc...

Tbf .... without that questionarre whether true or not is say a tough thing to prove as it usually is so long after. If that document is real.... he should be ****ed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Page_Moss_Kopite
DirtyFrank said:
Don't think the police saw that originally. It was internal correspondence between him and his lawyers..... the journos got it somehow.

DS journo saying she acted on advice of her lawyer at time to deal... turned out he specialised in mortgages or something not this type of thing. Her claim is she thought she'd get slaughtered by his fans etc...

Tbf .... without that questionarre whether true or not is say a tough thing to prove as it usually is so long after. If that document is real.... he should be ****ed
Click to expand...

Tbh at the time...... even now that lawyer was prob right but he didn't get her a tenth of what he could have.

Now after metoo... I'd like to think she'd be believed.

If there's documents that are privileged then they won't be admissible? But if they were part of non disclosure .... who knows
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank
I think we can all safely assume that because it's Ronaldo, no matter what's gone on, it'll be all cleared soon enough and the post office will be missing some very big, brown envelopes around the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank
DirtyFrank said:
Only issue in yankland is ... is it admissible depending on how it was obtained, in a criminal case?

Probably solid enough for a private case.
Click to expand...

Which explains why it's come out this way?

She wants another pay off.

Question is what happened to him.

Spacy is a pariah.... what will happen to ronaldo
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Tbh at the time...... even now that lawyer was prob right but he didn't get her a tenth of what he could have.

Now after metoo... I'd like to think she'd be believed.

If there's documents that are privileged then they won't be admissible? But if they were part of non disclosure .... who knows
Click to expand...
Apparently his lawyers ****ed up because as part of the agreement they were supposed to read a letter to him from her... they didn't.

I can see why they didn't...it would be a legal record that could be argued basically meant he admitted the act.

But...by not reading it to him, they broke the non disclosure deal.
 
DirtyFrank said:
Apparently his lawyers ****ed up because as part of the agreement they were supposed to read a letter to him from her... they didn't.

I can see why they didn't...it would be a legal record that could be argued basically meant he admitted the act.

But...by not reading it to him, they broke the non disclosure deal.
Click to expand...

Don't really get that. Should that be from him to her or what?
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Don't really get that. Should that be from him to her or what?
Click to expand...
Genuinely don't know...I might have misread... I just assumed she wanted him to have to sit there and listen to the consequences for her since she wasn't going to get satisfaction in a criminal trial.... sounds like something a crisis therapist would suggest as attempt at closure etc.
 
DirtyFrank said:
Genuinely don't know...I might have misread... I just assumed she wanted him to have to sit there and listen to the consequences for her since she wasn't going to get satisfaction in a criminal trial.... sounds like something a crisis therapist would suggest as attempt at closure etc.
Click to expand...
http://www.spiegel.de/international...-who-accuses-ronaldo-of-rape-a-1230634-2.html

It's in this for all to read. She sent him letter that was to be read to him, he was weating a white rosary apparently.

All quite detailed but it seems there's no clear indication rape kit found anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back