I’ve bust a few ribs laughting at the mad fool.I'm not sure about grasping but I'm gasping for air through laughing at the fool
I’ve bust a few ribs laughting at the mad fool.I'm not sure about grasping but I'm gasping for air through laughing at the fool
What none of you still fail to grasp is the club is not yours and you are just customers...The Americans can do and employ anyone they choose as long as it is beneficial to everyone.......Fans are irrelevant in what they want to do and which way they want to do it...And i'm afraid that's the way the cookie crumbles and i agree 100% with them because at the end of the day it is their club
![]()
but we knew alreadyDai told me that 90% of Swans fans are idiots and that he’s glad that he’s in the other 20%....I’ve bust a few ribs laughting at the mad fool.



Listen to our fantastic saviours ...you know it makes sense......If we listened to most of you muppets we would not have a club to support in a very short time...AND THAT'S A FACT....

I'm looking forward to meeting him in the Plough on Saturday.If we are muppets, what does that make you?
Feel free to answer as honestly as you can lads![]()
He’ll be in the directors box.I'm looking forward to meeting him in the Plough on Saturday.
Having never met the chap before I am sure I will spot him in his clowns hat and red nose.
A padded cell more would be more aptHe’ll be in the directors box.![]()

Dai - I don’t think any / many on this Not606 Board have advocated profligate expenditure, far from it posters clearly, in my opinion, recognise and understand that given the huge reduction in Revenues, we have to cut our cloth accordingly.Listen to our fantastic saviours ...you know it makes sense......If we listened to most of you muppets we would not have a club to support in a very short time...AND THAT'S A FACT....
A) Huw and the (old) Board stated that they would be responsible ‘sellers’. Has that been proven to be the case? A once ‘model’ club is now not viewed as such by the wider football world.
B) Huw and the (old) Board stated that the Club needed investment to move to the next level. That implies that Additional investment into the Club was the requirement. The Yanks took control by buying shares from private individuals - not via a Share Issue which would have seen cash injected into the business. Have the 27 Yanks put their hands into their pockets and either subscribed for new share capital or made any (term) loans to the club?
Given the above, would the football club be any worse off today if the old Shareholders had remained owners in charge?

I think the article today about Liverpool is very apposite. Here, the yanks bought for 300 million but have invested in the club and allowed it to grow. Some value the club at 1.49 bn. and there is an (apparent) offer for 2 bn. THAT's growing a club. But they haven't sold but are willing to take on a minority interest if it expands the club....presumably into the Middle East and China, based upon the ownership. Your Yanks are just a mixed group having a bit of a laugh and hoping for the big payout without putting anything into the club. Your former owners just dipped their wicks and ran.Dai - I don’t think any / many on this Not606 Board have advocated profligate expenditure, far from it posters clearly, in my opinion, recognise and understand that given the huge reduction in Revenues, we have to cut our cloth accordingly.
Has anyone suggested that we should be going out and paying tens of millions of pounds on players?
Fans’ expectations have been lowered. I suspect that most also recognise that further cuts will have to be made over the next couple of years when the parachute monies run out.
However, there are a number of factors that have caused and continue to cause concern
A) Huw and the (old) Board stated that they would be responsible ‘sellers’. Has that been proven to be the case? A once ‘model’ club is now not viewed as such by the wider football world.
B) Huw and the (old) Board stated that the Club needed investment to move to the next level. That implies that Additional investment into the Club was the requirement. The Yanks took control by buying shares from private individuals - not via a Share Issue which would have seen cash injected into the business. Have the 27 Yanks put their hands into their pockets and either subscribed for new share capital or made any (term) loans to the club?
Given the above, would the football club be any worse off today if the old Shareholders had remained owners in charge?
I think the article today about Liverpool is very apposite. Here, the yanks bought for 300 million but have invested in the club and allowed it to grow. Some value the club at 1.49 bn. and there is an (apparent) offer for 2 bn. THAT's growing a club. But they haven't sold but are willing to take on a minority interest if it expands the club....presumably into the Middle East and China, based upon the ownership. Your Yanks are just a mixed group having a bit of a laugh and hoping for the big payout without putting anything into the club. Your former owners just dipped their wicks and ran.

This is what has got the backs up of most discerning Jacks, the treachery of stitching up the club and supporters for personal gain, under the cover of 'investment into the club' to take us to the next level ............................![]()
Don’t really understand why we’re loaning a 20yr old whose only had some Championship experience. I hope Rodon keeps his spot so we develop players we actually ownCarter-vickers signed for season now we need another midfielder and striker
I get the impression that Potter doesn't want older players.Don’t really understand why we’re loaning a 20yr old whose only had some Championship experience. I hope Rodon keeps his spot so we develop players we actually own
Don’t really understand why we’re loaning a 20yr old whose only had some Championship experience. I hope Rodon keeps his spot so we develop players we actually own