I am partial to watching the odd fight and see no harm in a thread about it, political ones seem far more damaging to our mental health than one of Tyson fury's weak punches. At the end of the day it just seems like OTT pedantary in being all upity about no off topic label. I can understand those who oppose boxings stance, but I don't see the harm. Its an outlet for agression, a way for some people who might not have much by way of prospects to make a potentially very good living.
As others have highlighted, you couldn't step out side your front door with out risks and without doing something that would offend someone. When I'm a; modern world shunning, electric car driving, fruitarian who devotes his life only to charity and zero impact, I might cast a stone or two, but then life would be so dull I'd probably top myself with some organically sourced bit of creeper.
As for Fury, I don't know what to make of him, at his best like against Klitchko, he is clearly hard to hit and an awkward customer, in that form I just don't think Wilder has the skill to actually hit him with anything meaningful. But can Fury get back to his best? Was his best really that good? Did Klitchko take him for granted?
Fury whilst unbeaten has been down and not probably by a shot nearly as hard as those Wilder throws. But the reality is you have two fighters who have faced no one of real quality (The afforemented Klitchko accepted) So really its anyones fight, but my money goes on Wilder, Fury doesn't have knock out power, but I reckon Wilder will only need to find his target once in 12 rounds and will knock Fury out.
Bah!
