** STATEMENT REGARDING GLORY **

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Minxy said:
Excuse brb, WJ, he is selling himself short there .... sometimes super-mods just get a bit pissed off with explaining their every action to people who have it in for us at every turn. We do a really good job on here ... keeping the site spam - free & sorting out stuff behind the scenes. Occasionally we need to make unpopular decisions to ban people but it isn't taken lightly or in malice. & sometimes like above .... it is easier just to be sarcastic ..... especially when you come in from a full day at work to find a board up in arms about a decision that has been taken with their own mods approval
Click to expand...
Well Minxy, the 'good job' I'm seeing here is one of avoiding answering the questions. There is still no structure to the disciplinary 'system' currently employed. As I've alluded to earlier, it's like being banged up for life for 3 speedings and a piss in the street. All I'm asking for is transparency, proportion, and even a rudimentary 'escalator'-type list of disciplinary actions. All I've witnessed on this site is 'ban for life' after 'ban for life' issued. There is shocking communication to the other posters, far less the offender themselves.

I recall a conversation we had 2 years ago where you agreed with me & told me that the Supermods were keen to implement such a system. Not that keen, obviously. <doh>
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Eireleeds1 and leeds60
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back