#FreeSpurlock

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tobes said:
If people chuck those kind of comments about on that thread under the no abuse rule then they’d be sacked off, and would expect to be. If that’s what people were moaning about you’d be right,

Only that’s not why most people - me included - have been handed a ban.

Yet Saxton can label someone a non stop racist, and chuck out his usual level of inane abuse without sanction. That’s the point,
Click to expand...
Pixie came straight onto the thread called Saxton names and Saxton called him a racist.

Pixies only contribution weeks later is to ask why he was called a racist .
Others go there with the intention of getting banned .
Stan lives to be an annoyance so will constantly get banned.
Nsis is incapable of posting without a rage filled insult rant .
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
Saxton was banned God's cock hasn't posted on it and DMD hasn't been abusive.
Click to expand...
Saxton hasn’t been banned since the no abuse rule came in, despite being abusive. Welcome to the point.

Oh and GC has posted on it.
 
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
Saxton was banned God's cock hasn't posted on it and DMD hasn't been abusive.
Click to expand...
Saxton has not been banned by DMD. God’s Cock posts regularly, he just keeps changing his username as he tries to bury his drunken **** ups and DMD is regularly abusive.

Anyway, I wasn’t abusive the other night but was banned anyway as DMD was windmilling. There’s a reason why “those looking in” voted him King ****, despite the fact he posts the vast majority of his comments on one thread.
 
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
Pixie came straight onto the thread called Saxton names and Saxton called him a racist.

Pixies only contribution weeks later is to ask why he was called a racist .
Others go there with the intention of getting banned .
Stan lives to be an annoyance so will constantly get banned.
Nsis is incapable of posting without a rage filled insult rant .
Click to expand...
No he didn’t, that’s completely incorrect, try again.
 
Stan said:
Saxton has not been banned by DMD. God’s Cock posts regularly, he just keeps changing his username as he tries to bury his drunken **** ups and DMD is regularly abusive.

Anyway, I wasn’t abusive the other night but was banned anyway as DMD was windmilling. There’s a reason why “those looking in” voted him King ****, despite the fact he posts the vast majority of his comments on one thread.
Click to expand...
Saxton was banned when Colin Lee reported him which is what sparked the whole thing off.
 
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
Who didn't do what ?
Click to expand...
@PISKIE didn’t arrive on that thread and call Saxton names, before Saxton called him a non stop racist.

Yet Piskie got a week long ban for questioning the call to not ban him. He then got banned again for calling Saxton out and telling him to prove his assertion or withdraw it. Which made the rule and therefore the thread a complete joke.
 
Tobes said:
@PISKIE didn’t arrive on that thread and call Saxton names, before Saxton called him a non stop racist.

Yet Piskie got a week long ban for questioning the call to not ban him. He then got banned again for calling Saxton out and telling him to prove his assertion or withdraw it. Which made the rule and therefore the thread a complete joke.
Click to expand...
Maybe you can trawl back to where that happened, from what I recall Pixie came out with fat racist garage nonce or something to that effect .


Why did you tag pixie you cock gobbler?
 
Tobes said:
Saxton hasn’t been banned since the no abuse rule came in, despite being abusive. Welcome to the point.

Oh and GC has posted on it.
Click to expand...

I'd have to check, but I seem to recall I did block Pete from posting for a while. I blocked brb too.

I know for a fact I've warned Pete and plenty of other posters, who all took heed and moderated themselves accordingly, others couldn't manage that, and continued to be abusive and/or disruptive, which includes comments on modding, as there are/were several more appropriate places for that.

As ever, you really don't know what goes on, and comment based on your own misguided assumptions rather than reality. You not knowing, is not the same as something not happening.
 
End of the day if you abuse someone directly or indirectly...expect it back. Funny ****s trying to define what is abuse and what is 'the truth'

@DMD has got different rules depending on who you are therefore he loses all credibility

@brb sits back and allows it because he likes DMD fighting the battles on his behalf because Brb knows he can't really be a site owner and carry such views and DMD uses it to serve his own purpose.

Is it ok to call fat **** Pete the exact same thing he called Piskie?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
Spurlock said:
End of the day if you abuse someone directly or indirectly...expect it back. Funny ****s trying to define what is abuse and what is 'the truth'

@DMD has got different rules depending on who you are therefore he loses all credibility

@brb sits back and allows it because he likes DMD fighting the battles on his behalf because Brb knows he can't really be a site owner and carry such views and DMD uses it to serve his own purpose.

Is it ok to call fat **** Pete the exact same thing he called Piskie?
Click to expand...

:emoticon-0138-think Oooh look, here's another clown that posts with only half the information, but it suits his own biased agenda. :emoticon-0114-dull:
 
DMD said:
I'd have to check, but I seem to recall I did block Pete from posting for a while. I blocked brb too.

I know for a fact I've warned Pete and plenty of other posters, who all took heed and moderated themselves accordingly, others couldn't manage that, and continued to be abusive and/or disruptive, which includes comments on modding, as there are/were several more appropriate places for that.

As ever, you really don't know what goes on, and comment based on your own misguided assumptions rather than reality. You not knowing, is not the same as something not happening.
Click to expand...


Explain why I was banned yesterday
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan
DMD said:
The people banned, or rather that had the ability to post there temporarily removed, were from both sides, but only one side decided to whine. If there's any imbalance, it's because they are the ones most likely to be posting abuse and setting out to be disruptive, which were the very things they complained about.

The fact you didn't realise that, shows why I made the 'balanced' comment.
Click to expand...

There doesn't need to be any imbalance - or even questions of imbalance - if no one's banned/ has posting ability removed. This is the point I've been trying to make (and why I'd make an excellent Prem Board Mod might I add :) ).

If people want to complain about abuse on the Prem board then they should just be told to grow a pair. There's plenty of boards on this forum where rules and guidelines are in place to protect people who don't wanna be called a **** every five minutes. This board shouldn't be one of them though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back