Prefer Pedro myself honestly.I think willian is far better than Petro etc. nest Chelsea player after hazard
just my opinion mate. means nothing. pedro was good at one rime but dont think hes at the level. williaan has great work ethic.
as for Chelsea, just my opinion but when I see a squad reading green, drinkwater, Barkley I have to wonder.
however me must be clear that as of today their can field a really top top team. keeping hazard and courtois would be big though.
my Chelsea team would be
courtois
azpi christensen rudiger alonso
jorginho Kante fabregas
willian morata hazard
433
now... say they lose courtois and hazard and replace with pickford and just play pedro... not as good.
now factor in morata rumours.. Kanye to pay links... willian will be sold...
suddenly it starts looking like a big project.
I think this summer is crucial for them. they could be brilliant or nowhere
Willian was the only senior player I had any respect for in that season when they downed tools under Mourinho.
As much as I enjoy anything that discomfits José, I think professionals should get on with the job that they're paid for and giving anything less than your all is an insult to the fans.
Hazard is a great footballer, but I've no time for the selfish little turd after that.
This says our net spend under Klopp is just under £115m.
https://www.anfield-online.co.uk/stats/jurgen-klopp-lfc-transfer-signings.html
Can't be bothered trying to compare with other clubs - and anyway, in the case of City or Chavs it would have to be compared with their period of highest spending, and take into account the ridiculous inflation in the market.
I think we can safely say the criticism is just a case of opportunistic wummery.
Prefer Pedro myself honestly.
Willian is great but Pedro makes penetrating runs and tries to play one touch footie (but is very inconsistent). Willian is fine if we don't play hazard. With hazard it's a standing around fest to receive the ball and dribble dribble dribble
Willian or Hazard?
Hazards the better player and bigger game changer.
Also the younger. The only thing willian is better than hazard at is work ethic and he's got a better top speed (which he doesn't use properly).
I hate it when they both play together as the 2 wingers. Although I wouldnt mind trying willian in the centre which has never happened.
You only need to look at the output of the two players.
Personally wouldn't mind either staying or both. Just don't play them in the same team!
Hazard goal and assists record isn't good enough for a top player imo. He needs to improve his consistency and end product
Agreed for a top player.
but it's still far better than willians
I've been far more impressed by Willian than hazard when I've watched them.
Hazard on his day can be quality but I'll always pick consistency and hard work over occasional brilliance

I submitted five-man list months ago – Mourinho laments United's transfer business
Both of them? Must be good.Liverpool are allegedly set to go head to head with Chelsea and Bayern Munich in a bid to sign Christian Pulisic.
Bayern are said to be the favourites, with the Bavarians viewing the American as a natural heir to both Franck Ribery and Arjen Robben.
Liverpool could make a move for Pulisic with the view to bring him in as an alternative to Nabil Fekir.
Both of them? Must be good.
Really?Press like to exaggerate.
Anyone in Germany is linked to Bayern first.
Chelsea? who knows why.
us? klopp said he likes him.
I think Dortmund would be mad to unload a vital.player like this when after 12 month he will be a 120mil player.
personally I'd buy him in a heart beat if I were klopp
Like, all the time. Every story you read has a thousand exaggerations.Really?