England v Panama
- Thread starter remembercolinlee
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Unstoppable pen.
I agree with Southgate not making changes (except the enforced one).
England were always likely to be untroubled by Panama.
Give the players chosen as your first XI a chance to perform and build confidence. Nobody should be dropped after one game.
If he'd dropped Sterling and Rashford had come in and done well against limited opponents, then Sterling's confidence is shot and he knows he won't get back in. He becomes a passenger in the squad then. That's not good man management.
Rashford and Vardy are useful subs with their pace and will get opportunities if England do progress through the tournament.
The manager will also have to look at what selections are best suited to playing better opponents later on.
I agree with Southgate not making changes (except the enforced one).
England were always likely to be untroubled by Panama.
Give the players chosen as your first XI a chance to perform and build confidence. Nobody should be dropped after one game.
If he'd dropped Sterling and Rashford had come in and done well against limited opponents, then Sterling's confidence is shot and he knows he won't get back in. He becomes a passenger in the squad then. That's not good man management.
Rashford and Vardy are useful subs with their pace and will get opportunities if England do progress through the tournament.
The manager will also have to look at what selections are best suited to playing better opponents later on.
I just don’t get Panama. How many more warnings do they need that the ref ain’t gonna put up with the wrestling ****!..
