Should Sock Accounts be Allowed?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Allow Sock Accounts?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 43.8%

  • No

    Votes: 9 56.3%
  • Total voters
    16
Status
Not open for further replies.
luvgonzo said:
What harm do they really do?

The site has a history of sock accounts and some are funny (Village Bike)

Other come and go and it's a bit of fun so should we resolve the issue by freeing the socks?
Click to expand...


The Village Bike sock account was rightly banned for the harm it did to me and my family.

It's just a pity that the real perpetrators (Pixie and Skiddy) have escaped punishment.

As for sock accounts in general, there have been some truly great ones - 667 and A87 probably being the best - but there have been some dreadful ones.

I don't think socks should be permitted to mock or parody genuine posters, and I think certain posters (such as Skiddy and Commie) should be barred from holding any. Otherwise, a judicious sock, handled by experts such as myself and Stan, can be a good thing, enhancing the banter on this board and making life that little bit better for all of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpursDisciple
Hoddle Is A God said:
The Village Bike sock account was rightly banned for the harm it did to me and my family.

It's just a pity that the real perpetrators (Pixie and Skiddy) have escaped punishment.

As for sock accounts in general, there have been some truly great ones - 667 and A87 probably being the best - but there have been some dreadful ones.

I don't think socks should be permitted to mock or parody genuine posters, and I think certain posters (such as Skiddy and Commie) should be barred from holding any. Otherwise, a judicious sock, handled by experts such as myself and Stan, can be a good thing, enhancing the banter on this board and making life that little bit better for all of us.
Click to expand...

What a prick <laugh>
What harm has it done to you and your family? We only got to find out your a sad fat balding **** guitarist who plays pool halls and **** pubs.

A87 <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: gooner4ever
DMD said:
You can assume that if you like. <ok>

As far as I can see, no posts on this thread have been altered.
Click to expand...
Only assuming that cause very few have the capability. If you say it wasn't you then fine. @brb i guess it was you then? Would like to understand why part of my post was deleted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
I’m starting to think that this entire forum is just me and the cast of Split.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skylarker
Hoddle Is A God said:
The Village Bike sock account was rightly banned for the harm it did to me and my family.

It's just a pity that the real perpetrators (Pixie and Skiddy) have escaped punishment.

As for sock accounts in general, there have been some truly great ones - 667 and A87 probably being the best - but there have been some dreadful ones.

I don't think socks should be permitted to mock or parody genuine posters, and I think certain posters (such as Skiddy and Commie) should be barred from holding any. Otherwise, a judicious sock, handled by experts such as myself and Stan, can be a good thing, enhancing the banter on this board and making life that little bit better for all of us.
Click to expand...

... not you calling for other posters to be banned (again) ... surely <doh>
 
Skylarker said:
Yes you should. Mods shouldn't edit posts, without a good reason.

Why have we got mods on an unmoderated board anyway ffs?
Click to expand...


Very good question, especially one who’s disliked by 99% of the posters here.

Have a word with the Fuhrer. No, wait a minute, that didn’t work too well at time!...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back