I hope Stormy Daniels gets sued into a trailer part, apart from being a disgusting cum bucket, she broke an NDA after getting paid. Worst type of scum. I see that is worse than what Trump did, and of course no one has ever considered whether Melania has ****ed other people I seriously think she would have, Trump is hardly the catch. People who read CNN have had lobotomies Let me get this straight, we must believe a woman who signed an agreement not to speak about something, and took a lot of cash, and breaks that agreement. That is the definition of dishonest, and yet we are meant to believe everything she says. LMFAO
This thread is the biggest collecting of falsehoods on Trump and Brexit I have seen in one place on the whole internet so far, **** me Added in are things about his affairs and ****, stuff no one cares about. No one cares Obama is gay and Michelle has a cock Guess he is a liar too Obama killed thousands of innocent men women and children with drones and no one gave a ****, but Trump shagged a porn star a decade ago and ******s post it here like it matters. This thread is regressive ****** anti fact anti objectivity central I mean, your own government is murdering people abroad and you are here bleating about Trump's affairs and fake hacking claims and all manner or worthless bollocks, with massive virtue signalling. Happily for ye, I won't come back to this thread, you are ******s beyond reach, no amount of debunking of the **** you post here will change a thing. lmfao Modern liberalism is a kind of neurosis, you all feed on each other's regressive-ness and for some reason, reject reality. Pretty ****ing sad
So you say Cnn Is fake news. You say Washington Post is, I believe in the past you called BBC unreliable. You say Australian news is also fake. Do you believe anyone besides Fox News and Breitbart, or is anyone without a far right agenda all just fake news? You say that the Stormy Daniels is fake news in one post, then later say she's scum for breaking an NDA and talking about it. ... So let me get this straight... You're saying the news about Stormy Daniels is all fake... But she is scum for breaking a NDA. So now you do believe in the NDA... But only when it's to call SD scum. You could get a job in the Whitehouse for Trump as press secretary. I think you should apply.
Ok.. We're supposed to take you seriously after that? Wait... So after saying it's all false news you ARE acknowledging it. The matter isn't that he shagged a porn star. That just shows what a slimey individual he is... Especially the manner in which he did it... But that's not the problem. The problem is that the payoff was illegal. It's a bit like Clinton. The biggest trouble wasn't that he let Lewinsky suck on the first member, it's that he lied about it under oath. The sex act isn't the problem. See the problem here is that you get all your news from far right propaganda and conspiracy sites that rational thought and moderate viewpoints seem "******ed liberal" to you. You have all these nutjobs telling you that mainstream media is all corrupt and only they are telling the truth, you start to believe it and get a warped sense of reality. I'm a centrist. I do thint most people on this forum are quite left wing, but most of them seem rather rational.
Change of topic.... The current trade war between US and China. Not good for either nation. Wage growth is at the lowest it has been since the Bush administration, cost of goods about to go up here significantly. Not good for China either as US is by far their biggest export market. I suppose good news for everyone else. Everyone else will now get goods from both countries cheaper as affected industries now need to export elsewhere. Can imagine this will help Europe as long as they stay out of the trade wars.
Well... yes, And centrist is an over simplification too as it partially depends on which of the three axis one is talking about.
Dr Robert Epstein paper on manipulated search results The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/33/E4512.full.pdf How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election - Politico, very left leaning https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548 Dr Robert Epstein, Berkeley, liberal btw not conservative Google algorithms were manipulated to favour Hillary. According to his research the most vulnerable demographic to this manipulation was moderate conservatives He's correct of course, google manipulates the results of searches based on partisan politics. This has been known for quite some time. The paper above is 2014, his research since has proven google were actively trying to get Hillary elected simply by analysing other search engine results compared to google. Other search engines like Bing returned what people were searching for, Google returned positive Hillary results consistently as top ranked. I know google do this with science too, I've done my own research on that. 2 sites are an example, one left leaning one right leaning. Right leaning site gets millions of hits in traffic per month, it is the most viewed blog on that topic in the world (received several top science blog on the internet awards) Does open peer review of papers, where scientists contribute Left leaning site. Fraction of the traffic, no awards and has been embroiled in several scandals. This pertains to scientific information in graphic form. The left leaning site (even today) comes up in searches in images on google at a 1000\1 ratio compared to the much more successful right leaning site. In fact for most searches, to find data from the right leaning site, I had to use the name of the site in the search This was not true for the left leaning site, I would not use the name, and it's graphs were top of all the searches, actually multiple returns for that site per search. The problem with Google is, it knows you. Your smart phone knows you better than almost anyone you know (on average). This is a fact. Google collects so much information about you that it can manipulate you. Google has become a major problem. This has nothing to do with the gay partisan dishonest nonsense gibberish on this thread. It's also a sad indictment of current public discourse that I have to provide left leaning sources for such things. Really sad I have nowhere else to post this, so here it goes
as good a place as any. i still feel traditional listings done by trump and presence in key states swung it for him. but there's no question, all sides use this data mining and seek to influence. I'm sure in the dim and distant past they had data on who to coldcall to gain votes too.
I am sure you are right about all sides using data and communications to their advantage. But believing that a serial liar is telling more truths than most news channels is really a bit dim tbh. A liar who is so self serving that he would use his office to promote his and own family’s business interests. I have never seen a president so unsuitable for office and I cannot wait for him to leave. There have only been negatives and anyone would be better than him.
i totally agree. merely pointing out my view of that election is that the swing states were visited far more by trump and Clinton didn't so is it Facebook data or is it more people who were going to actually vote heating trumps promises while Clinton didn't say much of anything real to them
I see you cherry pick what to reply to. faux intellectual serial whinger, can't wait for your next "I'm leaving" meltdown
Wait, didn't you just leave? I have never flounced in my life. That's a crybaby thing to do, like you just did. Or didn't, I dunno, you make as much sense as the rest of your vocabulary vomit. And like the rest of your pointless crybaby wail, you have no data to back you up on that. When you make an intellectual point I'll address it. But you'd have to grow up first and I could be dead by then.
Wait.. after genuine replies to your posts previously, you avoid the challenge to your spurious claim re hacking, and jump on my slightly frustrated post instead, as that was a far easier post to reply to, with some substance free nonsense. You should have retired mate, you are just a Muppet now. But do continue posting fact free gibberish
