How do advertisers treat tin pot forums when they are used as vehicles for breaches of privacy and for the carrying out of cowardly cyber attacks?
Someone starts a thread about two other posters, but the ‘Pede always drag it back to me. It’s as though I own your minds.
Fortunately for you i was online at the time and immediately dealt with the offending article. Once i established who it was the person responsible served a ban. If i had acted sooner i would have banned the wrong person. The person who gave the user the key, publically apologised. However, i also learned a lesson in that whoever creates a multi sock account in future will all serve bans - if that had happened sooner, that would have included your friends. You are also to blame for constantly as a self claimed wum master revealing details about yourself. I've already banned at least one of your very own sock accounts. In regards to Sky he was banned at his own request. In regards to porn from others that is out of order and was also not helped by people venturing on to GC. Lay the blame where you choose, this is the last im im saying on the matter.
Anyway, I have every confidence that HIAG’s Sports Chat Bar will be a forum for the discerning footy fan. You can apply to the organisers for your season ticket.
Is HIAG's Sports Chat Bar anything like Les's Lounge of Loquaciousness? https://www.not606.com/threads/less-lounge-of-loquaciousness.271457/
I’m not going to bother to even try to correct your erroneous summary. The fact that you probably believe what you’ve written and have permitted the guilty parties to go unpunished is the reason why this board has lost two of its most charismatic posters, and why it is probably going to lose a couple more.
