She was less than PC about one of the South Korean skaters she'd crashed offwhat was the racist abuse, can't find it via google?
She was less than PC about one of the South Korean skaters she'd crashed offwhat was the racist abuse, can't find it via google?
For someone who can't stay on her feet, she has a lot to say.She was less than PC about one of the South Korean skaters she'd crashed off
Twitter is erupting with conspiracy theories from people who know **** all about speed skating, but because Elise Christie has a union flag on her onesie it means the judges were against her from the start because they're jealous...or...something.
Definitely not because she kept crashing people off the course - but on the plus side, she hasn't taken to Twitter to racially abuse her fellow competitors like she did in Sochi.




The suggestion is that Wiggins was using TUEs when there was no medical need at the particular time for the performance enhancing benefits alone.Must be missing something with these latest cycling revelations from the Select Committee report - even if it’s possible to get beyond the sheer comedy value of a group of politicians spouting about ‘ethics’
Wiggins is being castigated and his reputation dragged through the mud for following the rules as far as the administration of a TUE, because a few disgruntled 2nd rate cyclists (some now journalists) jealousy levels got the better of them.
Wiggins and Team Sky requested the TUE based on a previously documented medical condition. It was known at the time that the drug itself had potentially other beneficial affects for athletes (boost weight loss whilst maintaining strength). No-one appears to have stated that Wiggins didn’t have the asthma condition or that the condition was exaggerated and documents falsified and surely the Authorities would have checked this when the application was made?
Is Cycling free from substance abuse and cheating? Of course not, although undoubtedly cleaner than before and certainly cleaner than in 2012. Was Wiggins taking advantage of the opportunity, or as he says, leveling theplaying field?Who knows......However, I thought we lived in a world where one was innocent until PROVEN guilty. Don’t see a whole lot of proof in all this and MP’s spouting with the benefit of Parliamentary Privilege leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.
Mind you, Lord TaxPayersArena getting panned for being untruthful in his account about his knowledge of Russian doping is feckin’ hilarious....
![]()
Thanks for the warning, Spurf. I’ll have to turn it down then, after all. Damn!Anyone who accepts a knighthood loses all credibility in my eyes. It's the definition of a cheat in so many ways.
You don't need a knighthood audrey you are acclaimed on not606 anyway.Thanks for the warning, Spurf. I’ll have to turn it down then, after all. Damn!
For me the definition of a cheat is someone with an honorary knighthood who expects to be referred to as Sir Whatsisface when, as it's an honorary knighthood, there is no reason to do so other than pandering to the massive ego of an attention-seeking gobshiteAnyone who accepts a knighthood loses all credibility in my eyes. It's the definition of a cheat in so many ways.
For me the definition of a cheat is someone with an honorary knighthood who expects to be referred to as Sir Whatsisface when, as it's an honorary knighthood, there is no reason to do so other than pandering to the massive ego of an attention-seeking gobshite