He's back...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PleaseNotPoll said:
Something tells me that it wouldn't have made any difference.
It doesn't seem like the doxxing grass is going to get punished any time soon.
Caused you a fair bit of work too, hasn't he?
Click to expand...

Most the lads cause me a fair bit of work at one time or another, Matth didn't exactly help today. Overall i think we are all as bad as one another, me included. I think if HiaG had been anyone else, in truth i would have probably stopped it (hands-up) but i always felt with HiaG he was a player, playing the game, meaning i couldn't make out if he was genuinely up set or just crocodile tears. He don't help himself when he threatens legal stuff and reads me the rules, that never goes down well with me. I looked after Pete, well until he started having a pop at me.
 
brb said:
Most the lads cause me a fair bit of work at one time or another, Matth didn't exactly help today. Overall i think we are all as bad as one another, me included. I think if HiaG had been anyone else, in truth i would have probably stopped it (hands-up) but i always felt with HiaG he was a player, playing the game, meaning i couldn't make out if he was genuinely up set or just crocodile tears. He don't help himself when he threatens legal stuff and reads me the rules, that never goes down well with me. I looked after Pete, well until he started having a pop at me.
Click to expand...
HIAG is a WUM. He winds people up constantly and he's annoyed me on various occasions in the past.
He's not mean spirited or nasty though, which digging up somebody's personal details and throwing them about the forum definitely is.
Banning him or blocking him from boards is fine. Making other people concerned about their accounts isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpursDisciple, No Kane No Gain, remembercolinlee and 2 others
brb said:
Most the lads cause me a fair bit of work at one time or another, Matth didn't exactly help today. Overall i think we are all as bad as one another, me included. I think if HiaG had been anyone else, in truth i would have probably stopped it (hands-up) but i always felt with HiaG he was a player, playing the game, meaning i couldn't make out if he was genuinely up set or just crocodile tears. He don't help himself when he threatens legal stuff and reads me the rules, that never goes down well with me. I looked after Pete, well until he started having a pop at me.
Click to expand...

What’s Math done?

I always seem to miss the fun.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
HIAG is a WUM. He winds people up constantly and he's annoyed me on various occasions in the past.
He's not mean spirited or nasty though, which digging up somebody's personal details and throwing them about the forum definitely is.
Banning him or blocking him from boards is fine. Making other people concerned about their accounts isn't.
Click to expand...

^^^^^^^ this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No Kane No Gain, remembercolinlee and PleaseNotPoll
PleaseNotPoll said:
HIAG is a WUM. He winds people up constantly and he's annoyed me on various occasions in the past.
He's not mean spirited or nasty though, which digging up somebody's personal details and throwing them about the forum definitely is.
Banning him or blocking him from boards is fine. Making other people concerned about their accounts isn't.
Click to expand...

I did warn the lads about keeping talking about their private stuff, Pete none more so than most.

I don't wish to attach blame, but Skylarker his friend really didn't help the situation because he started to talk about the locations he had seen him at. The rest after that is not rocket science.

But HiaG still had himself to blame, I actually had stopped it all, and we had several weeks of peace, then HiaG arrives back and kicks it all off again. I just don't get why the guy didn't just use a sock to protect his identity if he was that worried about it.

I get people dumping their accounts all the time and coming back with a new one, it's fine by me and the easiest way to protect your identity, because we all know this lot know who he is, so it's an impossible task i'm being asked, so maybe i just became resigned to the situation, because HiaG rather than help me help him, still wanted to be the wum master.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
HIAG is a WUM. He winds people up constantly and he's annoyed me on various occasions in the past.
He's not mean spirited or nasty though, which digging up somebody's personal details and throwing them about the forum definitely is.
Banning him or blocking him from boards is fine. Making other people concerned about their accounts isn't.
Click to expand...
He can be nasty when he wants to “prove” he’s right about something that he’s abso-****ing-lutely wrong about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
brb said:
I did warn the lads about keeping talking about their private stuff, Pete none more so than most.

I don't wish to attach blame, but Skylarker his friend really didn't help the situation because he started to talk about the locations he had seen him at. The rest after that is not rocket science.

But HiaG still had himself to blame, I actually had stopped it all, and we had several weeks of peace, then HiaG arrives back and kicks it all off again. I just don't get why the guy didn't just use a sock to protect his identity if he was that worried about it.

I get people dumping their accounts all the time and coming back with a new one, it's fine by me and the easiest way to protect your identity, because we all know this lot know who he is, so it's an impossible task i'm being asked, so maybe i just became resigned to the situation, because HiaG rather than help me help him, still wanted to be the wum master.
Click to expand...
@Skylarker you've never met Hilary have you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
Stan said:
He can be nasty when he wants to “prove” he’s right about something that he’s abso-****ing-lutely wrong about.
Click to expand...
I've not experienced that and I'll happily admit that I ignore any thread on the Prem board that goes HIAG v Piskie and bumchums.
 
brb said:
I did warn the lads about keeping talking about their private stuff, Pete none more so than most.

I don't wish to attach blame, but Skylarker his friend really didn't help the situation because he started to talk about the locations he had seen him at. The rest after that is not rocket science.

But HiaG still had himself to blame, I actually had stopped it all, and we had several weeks of peace, then HiaG arrives back and kicks it all off again. I just don't get why the guy didn't just use a sock to protect his identity if he was that worried about it.

I get people dumping their accounts all the time and coming back with a new one, it's fine by me and the easiest way to protect your identity, because we all know this lot know who he is, so it's an impossible task i'm being asked, so maybe i just became resigned to the situation, because HiaG rather than help me help him, still wanted to be the wum master.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure sky was taking the piss about seeing him play <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skylarker
brb said:
I did warn the lads about keeping talking about their private stuff, Pete none more so than most.

I don't wish to attach blame, but Skylarker his friend really didn't help the situation because he started to talk about the locations he had seen him at. The rest after that is not rocket science.

But HiaG still had himself to blame, I actually had stopped it all, and we had several weeks of peace, then HiaG arrives back and kicks it all off again. I just don't get why the guy didn't just use a sock to protect his identity if he was that worried about it.

I get people dumping their accounts all the time and coming back with a new one, it's fine by me and the easiest way to protect your identity, because we all know this lot know who he is, so it's an impossible task i'm being asked, so maybe i just became resigned to the situation, because HiaG rather than help me help him, still wanted to be the wum master.
Click to expand...
Pete's impossible to defend because he posted under his real name and didn't appear to care about giving away all of his details.
So much so that I assumed that it was somebody else trying to tarnish his name at first, as I couldn't believe what I was seeing! <laugh>

I sincerely doubt that Skiddy tracked him down over social media. As one of his fellow Chelsea fans said, he just doesn't seem the type.
Should HIAG have changed accounts? Probably. It would be pretty obvious it was him though, unless he changed his posting style completely.
Does that mean that people should be able to blatantly dox him? Not in my opinion. Various people seem to share it.
Should forum users have to worry about some twat getting pissed off on here and tracking them down in real life? I don't think so.
 
Stan said:
He can be nasty when he wants to “prove” he’s right about something that he’s abso-****ing-lutely wrong about.
Click to expand...

He also revelled in revealing the content of PM's that one of his socks had with me. He tried to use it to make out that I'd said loads of stuff that I hadn't. He was very happy to share private and personal info when it suited him if he thought it would help him to get one over. I also lost count of the threads, comments etc about me inviting people to discuss what I did in my private life.

Typical HIAG, was happy to dish it out, threatened legal action when he got it back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, Born again Humanitarian, The Ginger Marks and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back