Off Topic Does this offend you?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You watch, the Boxing ring girls and American football cheerleaders will be targeted next.
****ing SJW parasites.
 
Bodinki said:
Yup, but their careers are all ****ed now.
Just so some hairy legged munters, who dont even watch motorsports can pat themselves on the back for achieving nothing except causing several thousand women worldwide to lose their jobs.

Well done <ok>
Click to expand...

There's a small group of people who are offended on behalf of us grid girls but there's not one girl who's been objectified that I know of, if we were we would complain, as would everyone around us.

Fat feminists and spurs fans.
 
BobbyD said:
nicked this from the QPR board.

about feminism its very good. Just listened to it in the background its really good
Click to expand...

OMG, it is me (the "multivariate analysis" part
was the clincher) :D

I apologise to society, as it comes across very
cold and soul-less to be so ( "machine-like" is
one term used) to people in general.
 
sharpe* said:
They have succeeded in preventing woman having the choice to work in this role.

They are so thick they can't even see they're regressing equality.

They're basically aiming to get rid of modelling which is a perfectly fine and legal career.
Click to expand...
That isn’t really true. I just don’t believe that F1 is pandering to feminists. If anyone is to blame it is the guys at the charity dinner who over stepped the mark and made F1 see they were running a risk
 
Commachio said:
Ive looked again, and i have still not changed my mind.

I'm struggling to see anything wrong, or anything offensive. (especially with 3rd from right)

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
That’s cos it isn’t wrong or offensive just not good business
 
Bodinki said:
Its also demeaning to men to think that because a woman is dressed a certain way, that it will encourage ordinary men to become rapists?
Is that what they think happens?
Normal good little Johnny walks down the street, catches a site of cleavage and turns into Johnny 23 and starts molesting folk?

90% of (sober) men know how to behave when they see an attractive woman.
Click to expand...
It’s more like 99% but the other 1% always claim she was asking for it.
 
BobbyD said:
why do we even need sexy clothes? we shouldn't be sexualising women at all and if we do, why are we just choosing pretty attractive girls, we should be making it compulsory that for every "normal" sized model, theres needs to be a plus sized one, an "uglier" one and not be drilling into people "this is what is attractive".
Click to expand...
We don’t need them but we don’t need laws against them either.
 
PowerSpurs said:
That isn’t really true. I just don’t believe that F1 is pandering to feminists. If anyone is to blame it is the guys at the charity dinner who over stepped the mark and made F1 see they were running a risk
Click to expand...

How is it not true?

Woman could do a job and now they cant.
 
PowerSpurs said:
That isn’t really true. I just don’t believe that F1 is pandering to feminists. If anyone is to blame it is the guys at the charity dinner who over stepped the mark and made F1 see they were running a risk
Click to expand...
So the answer is to ban the profession? <doh>

So if women wolf whistle at a fireman or objectify one in any way, the answer is to ban firemen? **** the the fact that they like their job or the service they provide, the answer is obviously banning the profession.

Its basically implying that men cannot be trusted around attractive women, so the answer is to remove the attractive women, not to tell the guys to stop being ****s and punish them, but to punish the women and make them lose their jobs.

Social justice at its best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gooner4ever, Commachio, PINKIE and 2 others
Bodinki said:
So the answer is to ban the profession? <doh>

So if women wolf whistle at a fireman or objectify one in any way, the answer is to ban firemen? **** the the fact that they like their job or the service they provide, the answer is obviously banning the profession.

Its basically implying that men cannot be trusted around attractive women, so the answer is to remove the attractive women, not to tell the guys to stop being ****s and punish them, but to punish the women and make them lose their jobs.

Social justice at its best.
Click to expand...
There hasn’t been a ban!
Businesses like F1 make decisions on what will benefit them. Whether you like it or not it is actually a risk for F1 if men behave badly around the ‘grid girls’. If one was assaulted then a lot of sponsorship money would be lost. Up to last week they probably didn’t see it as much of a risk. After the events at the charity dinner they have re-evaluated. It isn’t fair on the grid girls that they have lost opportunities because of the behaviour of others but that’s how capitalism works. Blaming it on SJWs is absurd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back