Vegas shooting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'm sure you like to think that.

My recollection is that I was referring to the fact that the usual section 106 charges had been abolished for smaller developments.

It doesn't make any difference what I'd like, you said that there were no longer any s106 agreements, then you were forced to admit that there are.
Also you're bullshitting about your claim that you 'recollect' that you were referring to smaller developments because the thread was talking about Spurs' new stadium

Looking forward to you tying yourself up in knots again over this later <ok>
 
What I meant to write is that for smaller developments, section 106 agreement contributions are essentially a thing of the past.

Why would you say that when the topic being discussed was Spurs' new stadium ?
 
I've gone for beef in oyster sauce, with chicken fried rice, and a cheeky chicken noodle soup.

My eldest has gone for sweet and sour chicken balls.
 
You should really have your savoury food before dessert. But you've been eating humble pie all day mate.

Hey, Pix!

What do you reckon to the news that Arsenal are going to be stuck with Woe-zil, because no other club wants the pop-eyed ****er?
 
Hey, Pix!

What do you reckon to the news that Arsenal are going to be stuck with Woe-zil, because no other club wants the pop-eyed ****er?

You can't change the subject and just hope that people will forget about your monumental **** up mate :)
 
You can't change the subject and just hope that people will forget about your monumental **** up mate :)

Oh, forgive me for asking you a football-related question on a footy forum!

What was I thinking of!

I take it from your deflection that this is an embarrassing news item for you Gooners, yeah?
 
Oh, forgive me for asking you a football-related question on a footy forum!

What was I thinking of!

I take it from your deflection that this is an embarrassing news item for you Gooners, yeah?

You've already blurted out that ****e on another thread though, so why repeat it here ?
Anybody would think you're trying to deflect and change the subject from your s106 **** up :)
 
You've already blurted out that ****e on another thread though, so why repeat it here ?
Anybody would think you're trying to deflect and change the subject from your s106 **** up :)

I'm going to enjoy revisiting that thread later, Pix.

For now, though, what's your view on being lumbered with Woe-zil? He's not going to be happy, is he? He'll have a face like thunder (and eyes like party poppers)!
 
Yeah, sure.

So, back to Woe-zil... what's your view?

You're chatting **** again HIAG. There's nobody calle Woe-zil

Why are you trying to deflect attention away from your **** up over saying that s106 no longer existed ?
 
... There's nobody calle Woe-zil...

Come off it!

You know full well who I am referring to.

Look. I know you are too embarrassed to respond, so let's leave it at that.

This thread, after all, is supposed to be about honouring those who died in that tragic FBI shooting, in Vegas.
 
This thread, after all, is supposed to be about honouring those who died in that tragic FBI shooting, in Vegas.

It was until you waded in with your 'gun expert' bollocks and then started acting like a prick telling people to go and play GTA and posting pictures of Nerf guns.

Who did the FBI shoot ?
 
Who did the FBI shoot ?

Ah, we're back on topic! At last!

So, you've not kept abreast of the intrigue, Pix? I'm not going to summarise it all, here, as it's easy enough for you to research yourself. Type the words "Vegas shootings unanswered questions" and you will be presented with everything you need to know.

Let me know what you think.