Off Topic International Match Thread

For anyone that fell asleep:

 

That. Was. ****.

 

. The great Kyle Walker.

Trippier and Aurier nowhere near good enough to lace his boots.

 

If you're going to sub Sterling for Keane, you'd want it to be Roy or Robbie coming on.
Why bring on an extra centre back at 0-0?

 

I'm not seeing the problem, myself. If they'd brought on Jack Butland, I'd not have complained.

 

Fixed for u!

 

To be fair to Southgate, it actually worked.
They'd thrown on another striker and he nullified that and added width from the fullbacks.
I thought it was a bit too negative at the time, but Walker got the assist, so I guess he got that right.
A bit fortunate and the rest of it was a total ****show, but still.

 

**** me we won I lost the will to live last time I watched. Were gonna win the world cup Yeh Yeh Yeh I'm gonna win the lottery. Same old England from what I watched .Cahill stones oxo well we have 2 hopes of winning it bob hope and no hope .on the up note COYS let's get back to watching proper football

 

You forgot Cape Hope.

 

Kane scores on September 35th.

 

Blimey.I actually sat and watched it right through.I may need to see a doctor! I did get to see the ex Spurs duo provide the winner.

 

I thought before the match that international football is better than no football, i might have to alter
that opinion.

 

I was there. The loudest crowd noise was when paper aeroplanes reached the pitch. Henderson and Oxlade-Chamberlain shouldn't be near the squad. Having Sterling in the No 10 position is laughable. Its a real eye-opener as to how good Eriksen and Dele are.

 

How England could do with someone like Eriksen.

 

If it was 51 games, it's quite a meltdown

 

Did Winks feature?

 

So no need now for Southgate to risk any of
Kane/Alli/Dier/Trippier in the final group game.
I am in similar mind about Winks too.

 

No, I don't believe so. I could have nodded off and missed it though.

 

Sure, if he has out interests in mind. Not sure why he would though.