Roger Johnson - sub human

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I have no problem with SR's desire to see zero tolerance for personal abuse, but that cuts both ways.
On the forum he chooses to post on, threats of violence have been openly made more than once, against the very people he now defends against protesters.
Where is the zero tolerance for posts about how incredible it is that Rick Everitt has not been beaten up yet while standing on the street selling his fanzine. Or that the CEO of Charlton Athletic should fear for her personal safety.

Sauce for the goose.
Those who are willing to tolerate threats being issued by some people, are not in a position to pontificate about abuse coming from others.
Hateful personal abuse and threats of violence are always wrong, wherever they come from.
 
I have no problem with SR's desire to see zero tolerance for personal abuse, but that cuts both ways.
On the forum he chooses to post on, threats of violence have been openly made more than once, against the very people he now defends against protesters.
Where is the zero tolerance for posts about how incredible it is that Rick Everitt has not been beaten up yet while standing on the street selling his fanzine. Or that the CEO of Charlton Athletic should fear for her personal safety.

Sauce for the goose.
Those who are willing to tolerate threats being issued by some people, are not in a position to pontificate about abuse coming from others.
Hateful personal abuse and threats of violence are always wrong, wherever they come from.

When all said & done the only incident of violence at Charlton in the last 12 months was a teenage girl knocking out Reams.