I was offering to offer evidence against the existence of God, as you requested when you declined to offer evidence for his/her/its existence, but first I need to know what kind of God we are talking about. If you don't want to play just say. I have no expectation of changing your or anyone else's mind, I just enjoy the debate.Well no, I can't conceive a state without time, because it's not possible given the rules of expansion, entropy and decay that govern the physical universe we are inhabiting. For something to happen, there must be a time period for it to happen in.
And I know the concept of time is just a way we measure the change between one state and another, but we're measuring something that is the major enabler for everything, just as oxygen, fuel and an ignition source are the enablers for fire. take any one of those away and fire doesn't happen. Same with time - take it away, and nothing happens.
There's no 'timeless state' because you then get to the position of absolute entropy (and the fact that this state can be reached is further proof of how intrinsic time itself is to basically everything).
As for my 'refusal' to offer evidence for God, I don't need to. I look around and see what I would call evidence, just as you look around and derive different conclusions from the same evidence. I very much doubt there's anything I can say or do that would prove either of our positions to your satisfaction, other than killing you and then you'll either see everything or nothing. By that time, of course, you couldn't let me know either way, and so I guess we'll just have to wait in expectation/hope/dismissiveness and see for ourselves...
I'll come back to you on the time stuff, I'm intrigued in it now.