Lets face it this is like the friendly football community board. Also you guys aren't proper liverpool fans on a liverpool board anyway, you aren't deluded enough
Don't you ****ing believe it

Lets face it this is like the friendly football community board. Also you guys aren't proper liverpool fans on a liverpool board anyway, you aren't deluded enough

We heard this before, Keita fee agreed and so on.Yeah, probably nonsense though.
I'd be quite interested in how many rumours actually happen, I imagine it's a very low percentage. Sick of it all now we need to get a defender in without a doubt and if it's not VVD then get another target it's very frustrating.

Totally disagree. Lovren & Klaven are comedy gold, the majority of the football community are enjoying watching them play.![]()

Do they? Football clubs are private entities and are allowed to accept/reject offers at their will. They are not obliged to accept identical offers.
http://www.skysports.com/football/n...rth-138m-bid-for-liverpools-philippe-coutinho
Sky just won't stop humiliating themselves will they!
A source has told them next bid is 101m upfront 37m add ons.
If you lot genuinely get that offer from Barca of £101m upfront and 35 odd in add ons you should probably just take it tbh.
A contract works both ways - if VVD was to say that he wished to move to Liverpool, and Liverpool matched all terms that Chelsea did, then under contract and employment law they wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Bottom line is, even though VVD has put a TR in, all three parties have to agree a move, not just the two clubs.
Moot point though - VVD will go to Chelsea if they stump up enough money and Soton say they won't listen to any offers from Liverpool.
Unless we get a replacement then he's not for sale.
Southampton would be under no legal obligation to accept an offer from Liverpool, irrespective if it matched the terms offered by another club.
He's their player and under contract, they can choose to sell - or not - to whoever they choose.
Irrelevant. You said they'd fall foul of contract and employment law if they refused to accept an offer from Liverpool that matched another that they'd received - they wouldn't.And VVD can choose not to be sold to any club that Soton choose. For the umpteenth time, a contract works both way.

We need people in regardless of Coutinho going or staying. If Kovacic rumours were true (which they aren't) then we need him on top of keeping Coutinho.
Arsenal and Liverpool have been given fresh hope of signing Jean-Michael Seri from Nice after his proposed move to Barcelona fell through, reports in Spain say.
Seri has emerged as a target for a number of clubs this summer and Tottenham are also believed to be admirers of the 26-year-old midfielder.
because it was never happening, Barca were using him as a threat. 'Don't accept our offer and we'll move on, look we're bidding for Seri (not really though)'Why, just WHY at this stage in the window? Plus, Barca being Barca, it isn't 'Upfront' at all. It's more than about money now - if FSG climb down under any terms whatsoever now they may as well sell the club on 1st September.
Virgil van Dijk to Liverpool: Southampton release statement after announcing new signing
SOUTHAMPTON seem to have confirmed Virgil van Dijk will not be leaving for Liverpool in a statement announcing the signing of Wesley Hoedt from Lazio.
You must log in or register to see images
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/fo...tatement-Southampton-Wesley-Hoedt-Lazio-Klopp
Its very simple why. Its mischief on the night before our cl play off tie to disrupt our prematch preparations.
Its a long shot but my view is they want to upset the dressing room or get klopps eye off the ball so we end up in europa and habe to sell.
Note what they did prior to first leg.![]()

Southampton would be under no legal obligation to accept an offer from Liverpool, irrespective if it matched the terms offered by another club.
He's their player and under contract, they can choose to sell - or not - to whoever they choose.