
He's bang average.............. and gingerSam Clucas being mentioned.
Burnley bid £10m
He's bang average.............. and ginger

A complete lack of forward planning and scouting.
'However, Sky Sports News has now claimed that, just a few hours after the Clarets were quoted £20m for Clucas, the Swans have stepped in with a view to signing a replacement for Gylfi Sigurdsson.'
£10 million has become 20.
We were c£8 million to the good in summer dealings before Siggy left so NO INVESTMENT policy appears to be the way our majority shareholders.
Had he stayed we would still have needed to strengthen wide attack, midfield and right back.
Then maybe we have to go abroad where there may be better value, 5-8 for Clucas and not a penny more. Hope we don't pay that much for him.But we will now be held to ransom and have to pay big money for average players, as you say, a £10m player now becomes £20m because other clubs know we have £50m to spend.
It's ludicrous they declared that we need to sell Gylfi to bring in new players. That alone, has increased each targets value by £5--£10m.
We should have had a deal in place with Everton, kept everything quiet for a day or two, announce in the press that a deal is way off, got our targets done and then announced that a fee had been agreed.
Then maybe we have to go abroad where there may be better value, 5-8 for Clucas and not a penny more. Hope we don't pay that much for him.
How can you say that when in his press conference Clement said he was always planning for Siggy to go and had his targets in mind.A complete lack of forward planning and scouting
Didn't Sahin play for Liverpool? A loan I think? I remember people talking highly of him.
