I doubt we'll be buying a £20m+ striker or attacking midfielder. Just can't see Ashley balancing that we've £100m+ coming in to fund it. To him, I'd suggest that the income is for back pocket use only. We'll see.
The problem is cash flow. Yes there is £100m+ coming in this season but it doesn't all hit at the start of the year so we only have what money is in the coffers, some from player sales if we can sell them, and hopefully some up front cash from the new sponsorship deal. Ashley isn't putting his own money in and frankly that's fair enough - the club is entirely capable of being self-sufficient. I don't think £20m+ would put either Rafa, Charnley or Ashley off but it would have to be for a really good player and need to be value for money. Rafa will also have to look at it from the perspective of the strength of the whole squad - would he prefer 2 x £10m plays or one £20m player.I doubt we'll be buying a £20m+ striker or attacking midfielder. Just can't see Ashley balancing that we've £100m+ coming in to fund it. To him, I'd suggest that the income is for back pocket use only. We'll see.
Taylor off to Burnley apparently. £5MI'd still want one of Joe Bryan or Charlie Taylor.
The problem is cash flow. Yes there is £100m+ coming in this season but it doesn't all hit at the start of the year so we only have what money is in the coffers, some from player sales if we can sell them, and hopefully some up front cash from the new sponsorship deal. Ashley isn't putting his own money in and frankly that's fair enough - the club is entirely capable of being self-sufficient. I don't think £20m+ would put either Rafa, Charnley or Ashley off but it would have to be for a really good player and need to be value for money. Rafa will also have to look at it from the perspective of the strength of the whole squad - would he prefer 2 x £10m plays or one £20m player.
Have to say I'm pretty confident Gayle will score goals in the Premier League. He has before and I'd say he's probably a better player now than 2-3 years ago. The problem is he can't be expected to do it all on his own and there are questions as to whether he can stay fit. Ideally someone better would come in to be first choice and Gayle would come on for 15-20 minutes when we need a goal or he'd start games when we need to rest players.It will rest on whether Gayle can keep up his performances from last season against PL opposition. Could be he surprises us all, stays fit and leads the line all season - after all he'll have fewer matches to play this coming season. Rafa's been making astute signings so far to shore us up at the back and give us pace on the wings. Given the choice I'd say we'd be best spending the remainder of our kitty on a single goal-scoring AM of real quality. It's madness to go into the season with de Jong, Perez and Diame in that position who by turns will get muscled out of games and run rings around.
Edit: snap
Would be a cracking loan up top with Mitro, Mid-Table finish at least. City will compensate his wages, Stoke won't have paid £130 K.
I'm suggesting that our own money, not Ashley's, may be being blocked. Last season didn't we have a huge transfer profit, a big parachute payment and 50,000 paying punters every home game? We shouldn't need the TV money just now - though Huddersfield are probably borrowing to survive this season.Ashley isn't putting his own money in and frankly that's fair enough - the club is entirely capable of being self-sufficient.
The fact that Saivet was sent packing last season when we were in the Championship would lead one to draw an obvious conclusion about whether Rafa believes he is capable of hacking it in the Premier League. Had to have a little chuckle at the "Colback role" statement - as in passing sideways or to the opposition and letting anyone with the ball run past him.I am surprised at Rafa binning Krul, Saivet and Lazzaar telling them surplus to requirements. Krul has been a loyal servant and deserves better, not bothered about Lazaar but Saivet is a mystery. Reason I say this is because when he was in the team he played OK in the Colback role and looked a decent one in the making. I do not think he's been given a fair crack of the whip so can only assume they've fallen out with Rafa. If they'd been Spanish they'd have been ok ( Krull & Saivet )
Some of Rafa's dealings are head scratching moments.
If Rafa has had another look and is again sending him packing then I think it's fair to say he's not going to pass muster.And how much were our overheads? We were paying Premier League wages while earning Championship revenues and we probably made in my estimation very roughly a £30m loss last season - we will see how close I am to that number in 9 or 10 months when the annual accounts are published. I get a little sick of hearing this mis-informed crap to be honest after having explained it about a million times on here. We spent every penny we had last summer. You can say we made a £30m profit last year in transfers "so we have £30m in the bank", except the £30m we got for Sissoko was to paid in £6m instalments over 5 years so at least £24m of it wasn't in the bank at all. Winning the league brought in £7m - it's **** all to fund buying players for the Premier League. Cash flow can't be great; it's certainly nowhere near as good a side who just played in the Premier League last year and has their hands on the enormous TV money that we don't have.I'm suggesting that our own money, not Ashley's, may be being blocked. Last season didn't we have a huge transfer profit, a big parachute payment and 50,000 paying punters every home game? We shouldn't need the TV money just now - though Huddersfield are probably borrowing to survive this season.
We should be in a stronger financial position than our promotion buddies to go for it. The window isn't closed though.
Agreed, hate the fat twat but it's a fact.And how much were our overheads? We were paying Premier League wages while earning Championship revenues and we probably made in my estimation very roughly a £30m loss last season - we will see how close I am to that number in 9 or 10 months when the annual accounts are published. I get a little sick of hearing this mis-informed crap to be honest after having explained it about a million times on here. We spent every penny we had last summer. You can say we made a £30m profit last year in transfers "so we have £30m in the bank", except the £30m we got for Sissoko was to paid in £6m instalments over 5 years so at least £24m of it wasn't in the bank at all. Winning the league brought in £7m - it's **** all to fund buying players for the Premier League. Cash flow can't be great; it's certainly nowhere near as good a side who just played in the Premier League last year and has their hands on the enormous TV money that we don't have.
Last 2 years Ashley has certainly given up the hoarding of cash and allowed the coffers to be emptied. £80m we had in the bank at the start of the season before last was spent (and wasted) and everything we had last summer was given to Rafa. The outcome from the meeting between Ashley and Rafa this summer has resulted in the club stating everything that is available will be made available for transfers, and of that I have no doubt. A lot of people read that as we'll be be billy big bollocks in the marketplace but anyone with half a sense of what the reality is realised there would be cautious spending going on.
Do you support Sunderland and Newcastle?
Sunderland Tel , and North East football, prefer to see Newcastle win than your lot.Do you support Sunderland and Newcastle?
Sunderland Tel , and North East football, prefer to see Newcastle win than your lot.
If you get a bit sick of hearing misinformed crap on these boards I'd suggest you limit your time on here! It seems that many of us mere fans don't have the inside knowledge of accounts that you do.And how much were our overheads? We were paying Premier League wages while earning Championship revenues and we probably made in my estimation very roughly a £30m loss last season - we will see how close I am to that number in 9 or 10 months when the annual accounts are published. I get a little sick of hearing this mis-informed crap to be honest after having explained it about a million times on here. We spent every penny we had last summer. You can say we made a £30m profit last year in transfers "so we have £30m in the bank", except the £30m we got for Sissoko was to paid in £6m instalments over 5 years so at least £24m of it wasn't in the bank at all. Winning the league brought in £7m - it's **** all to fund buying players for the Premier League. Cash flow can't be great; it's certainly nowhere near as good a side who just played in the Premier League last year and has their hands on the enormous TV money that we don't have.
Last 2 years Ashley has certainly given up the hoarding of cash and allowed the coffers to be emptied. £80m we had in the bank at the start of the season before last was spent (and wasted) and everything we had last summer was given to Rafa. The outcome from the meeting between Ashley and Rafa this summer has resulted in the club stating everything that is available will be made available for transfers, and of that I have no doubt. A lot of people read that as we'll be be billy big bollocks in the marketplace but anyone with half a sense of what the reality is realised there would be cautious spending going on.
Maximum respect, talk about having the worst of both worlds.Sunderland Tel , and North East football, prefer to see Newcastle win than your lot.
Talk in the papers and internet today of progress with the move for Samaris and also a Brazillian called Allan.
By reputation. as I can't recall ever seeing either one play, they would be decent buys leaving space for a "great" buy/loan of Batshuyai who got mentioned yesterday in the papers.
Talk in the papers and internet today of progress with the move for Samaris and also a Brazillian called Allan.
By reputation. as I can't recall ever seeing either one play, they would be decent buys leaving space for a "great" buy/loan of Batshuyai who got mentioned yesterday in the papers.