Josh Tymon

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The Trust have absolutely no interest in Ruscador. It's just something you hear about every so often and if you speak to people who were affected you find out what happened.

I'm sure they were all liars too though. Like everyone else. Probably just racist.
When do you speak to people affected? Anyone else spoken to them on he? I ****ing haven't.
A business went bust thirty years ago. It wasn't illegal.
You're ****ing warped for going on about it.
 
The Trust have absolutely no interest in Ruscador. It's just something you hear about every so often and if you speak to people who were affected you find out what happened.

I'm sure they were all liars too though. Like everyone else. Probably just racist.
Some people don't give a crap about how others are treated as long as they are ok
It's called lack of social conscience.
 
When do you speak to people affected? Anyone else spoken to them on he? I ****ing haven't.
A business went bust thirty years ago. It wasn't illegal.
You're ****ing warped for going on about it.

One of those affected used to post on here, he said the Allams weren't to be trusted, he posted lots of details when they first took over the club.

He got a right hard time and disappeared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: southerntiger
One of those affected used to post on here, he said the Allams weren't to be trusted, he posted lots of details when they first took over the club.

He got a right hard time and disappeared.

I recall Eddie Boggins on CI saying something similar when they first took over - said, based on what he knew of them (based on Ruscador I think), it would all end in tears.

He got a fair bit of abuse for it too - not that he (seemingly) gave a ****.
 
Just to show the utter ****itude of agents read the interview with Steven caulker in the guardian.

Perhaps the most devastating detail of Steven Caulker's interview with The Guardian was that, in the midst of his battle with depression caused by gambling and alcohol addictions, his agent and his club, Queens Park Rangers, tried to flog him to Lokomotiv Moscow.

How a man of colour, in his mental state, could have moved to Russia at such a lonely, vulnerable, emotional nadir is unfathomable. How his club could have seen only the financial bottom line is disturbing. How an agent, with a duty of care, could have self-servingly suggested it as a fresh start is despicable.

The only person who emerges with credit is Rangers manager Ian Holloway. 'He was actually telling me to stay,' Caulker recalled. 'I'd been in his office close to tears. He said, 'How anyone could think sending you there would be a good idea is beyond me. You need to get yourself right'. I appreciated him for that.'

Caulker did not go. One gets the impression he is no longer with his nameless, shameless representative, too. Anyone who is might wish to consider their options.

I thought Caulker was bang average, but clearly a lot of those in the game rate/rated him.

Maybe his mental state now explains him not fulfilling his reckoned ability or potential.
 
Interesting if true that he decided by December he 'didn't want to stay'.

I think that's just a "version of events" post-season from the agent. It's twisted a little to make it look like he never wanted to be here.

It's worth remembering Manchester United were sniffing around over Christmas. Something that then didn't materialise but something he'd have jumped at the chance of.

He certainly "didn't want to stay" because he wanted to join Stoke back in December. There was no interest from Stoke then.
 
I think that's just a "version of events" post-season from the agent. It's twisted a little to make it look like he never wanted to be here.

It's worth remembering Manchester United were sniffing around over Christmas. Something that then didn't materialise but something he'd have jumped at the chance of.

He certainly "didn't want to stay" because he wanted to join Stoke back in December. There was no interest from Stoke then.
Maybe Man U didn't fancy paying 7 grand a week??
Again who benefits most from this the agent or Tymon.
Stoke have no history of bringing through youth players, as far as I know. They've always paid way over the odds for experienced players.
 
Maybe Man U didn't fancy paying 7 grand a week??
Again who benefits most from this the agent or Tymon.
Stoke have no history of bringing through youth players, as far as I know. They've always paid way over the odds for experienced players.

He wasn't actively looking for 7k. Not even 5k was a target. Stoke have offered over the odds and I'm not entirely sure why they came in with 7k.

His agent undoubtedly does benefit from this the most if he does end up going. All depends on how legal the clubs extension is/was.
 
Maybe Man U didn't fancy paying 7 grand a week??
Again who benefits most from this the agent or Tymon.
Stoke have no history of bringing through youth players, as far as I know. They've always paid way over the odds for experienced players.

The agents not going to get anything of note out of a player going for compo.