Off Topic Aliens

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Which bits of science support the god of your book?

The science in the book was mainly taken from the Greeks, including the errors, such as Galen's theories on embryonic stages and all things coming in pairs, and no mention of bacteria


Page 24 questions answered first. Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
It really does

I can cut and paste too

Yes, we know you can. We have umpteen pages of this article as proof of that. :(


"In science, a model is a representation of an idea, an object or even a process or a system that is used to describe and explain phenomena that cannot be experienced directly. Models are central to what scientists do, both in their research as well as when communicating their explanations."

None of which contradicts my statements :

1. of what a model is
2. that gods by definition neither are nor need, a model of anything.
 
I did and you ignored hence why we are where we are

You claimed I was bring indignant I asked how? Nada

Koran and paganism? Nada

Etc etc etc

I haven't ignored you. I'm eagerly awaiting a response, showing which bits you disagree with, and why. As you're struggling, I'll break my answer down a bit more, although you'll most likely claim these are extra questions.

Do you agree that many of the Islamic traditions, such as the kaaba, ramadan stoning the devil etc, were practiced by pagans?

Do you agree that irrespective of any claims to divine voices, (or bells apparently) the koran was written by humans?

Do you agree that some would like a totally islamic world, run based on the concept of the koran?
 
Saying Submission to Allah gives you more free will than being non religious ,is like saying Joseph Fritzel's daughter was more free than girls that weren't locked in an underground sex dungeon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Saying Submission to Allah gives you more free will than being non religious ,is like saying Joseph Fritzel's daughter was more free than girls that weren't locked in an underground sex dungeon.
I tuned out ages ago. He seems like a decent guy but his answers are the standard pre programmed fingers-in-ears la la la la.
 
Yes, we know you can. We have umpteen pages of this article as proof of that. :(


"In science, a model is a representation of an idea, an object or even a process or a system that is used to describe and explain phenomena that cannot be experienced directly. Models are central to what scientists do, both in their research as well as when communicating their explanations."

None of which contradicts my statements :

1. of what a model is
2. that gods by definition neither are nor need, a model of anything.

I await your proof of these umpteen cut n paste's.

How can you deny models of God?
 
I haven't ignored you. I'm eagerly awaiting a response, showing which bits you disagree with, and why. As you're struggling, I'll break my answer down a bit more, although you'll most likely claim these are extra questions.

Do you agree that many of the Islamic traditions, such as the kaaba, ramadan stoning the devil etc, were practiced by pagans?

Do you agree that irrespective of any claims to divine voices, (or bells apparently) the koran was written by humans?

Do you agree that some would like a totally islamic world, run based on the concept of the koran?

These look suspiciously like more questions.

Answers first thanks
 
These look suspiciously like more questions.

Answers first thanks

They are elaborations to the answers already given.

The ball is in your court to say which bits you don't agree with and why.

Right now, people could be forgiven for thinking you're being cowardly and dishonest in avoiding responding.
 
They are elaborations to the answers already given.

The ball is in your court to say which bits you don't agree with and why.

Right now, people could be forgiven for thinking you're being cowardly and dishonest in avoiding responding.

I clearly stated no more discussion until you answer questions too

This was always meant to be a discussion not a QnA

I gives a **** what people may or may not think, good job too coz reading the politics etc threads most thing you ramble on and have **** all to say

Can you answer the questions?
 
Last edited:
I tuned out ages ago. He seems like a decent guy but his answers are the standard pre programmed fingers-in-ears la la la la.

Si said drinking a beer and eating a hot dog are apostasy

It never happened so whatbdo you want me to say to the guy?
 
"Page 24 questions answered first."

Ad nauseum, QED.


"How can you deny models of God?"

1. I don't.
2. Please feel free to show us where I have done so ...


I am confused, that is your response to my asking where my cut and pastes you accused me of are?

Just to clarify you say "I don't" to my question of do you deny models of God?

Because earlier you said

gods by definition neither are nor need, a model of anything.

To address your question "please show where I have done so" ta da!
 
Your children are muslims
They had no choice they have to submit
They have far less free will and choices than non Muslims.
If they want to leave Islam ,drink a beer and eat a hotdog that is Apostasy .

Punishable by shunning from the family/community or death.

I coloured in what apostasy is as you struggle with English.
The Parliament thing what ?