Off Topic Aliens

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PleaseNotPoll said:
Another baseless claim. Boring.

It was a debate involving four people, one of whom formed the hosting society, who voted on the outcome.
They were asked how many of them had changed their minds. Do you know how the vote went?
Click to expand...

Student vote backs my claim

What backs you?
 
thefanwithnoname said:
You transcribed a few words and dismissed it.
What's wrong with what he said? Not just what you transcribed but all of what he said?

That was my initial question which you haven't addressed. Can you address it?
Click to expand...
I dismissed what he was saying because it was based upon a false premise.
He was claiming that nobody questioned evolution. You're actual proof that's not true.
If the initial premise is false, then the sections built on that become irrelevant.
I've already said this.

What gaps are there in the theory of evolution?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I dismissed what he was saying because it was based upon a false premise.
He was claiming that nobody questioned evolution. You're actual proof that's not true.
If the initial premise is false, then the sections built on that become irrelevant.
I've already said this.

What gaps are there in the theory of evolution?
Click to expand...

Fossil gap, horizontal not vertical evolution, no one has witnessed all adoects if whatvis proposed, false conclusions etc

Based on whatvyou have said you should dismiss it no?
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Fossil gap, horizontal not vertical evolution, no one has witnessed all adoects if whatvis proposed, false conclusions etc

Based on whatvyou have said you should dismiss it no?
Click to expand...
None of that is true. It's all utter bollocks made up by creationist lunatics with no scientific knowledge.
Feel free to post some examples, though.
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Science backs you in who won a debate between a rabbi and Dawkins?

Methinks not

Student vote backs me, you?
Click to expand...
No, science backs me on evolution. A debate about morality in front of a Rabbi's society is irrelevant.

As I asked before, what was the student vote? You don't know, because you haven't even seen it.
As usual, you're just latching on to whatever you think supports your feelings about an issue.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
No, science backs me on evolution. A debate about morality in front of a Rabbi's society is irrelevant.

As I asked before, what was the student vote? You don't know, because you haven't even seen it.
As usual, you're just latching on to whatever you think supports your feelings about an issue.
Click to expand...

Remind me what we were discussing here?

Its for your ssje as you seem confused or are deliberately changing the discussion

I gave names and dates, just no YouTube link

You want numbers for student vote don't you? <laugh>
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
He's not anything. He's dead.
He was what you'd describe as an evolutionist, though.
Click to expand...

Can't you just answer the question for once?

So he was not a creationist and is an evolutionist?

Yet he questioned the basic presumptions of evolution

Or how about romers gap? Is that creationist nollox?
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Remind me what we were discussing here?

Its for your ssje as you seem confused or are deliberately changing the discussion

I gave names and dates, just no YouTube link

You want numbers for student vote don't you? <laugh>
Click to expand...
We're discussing some Hare Krishna bloke that wrote a book of bullshit.
You decided that a debate on evolution supported your claims that evolution isn't true, for some reason.
I pointed out that it didn't. You got upset.

What's ssje?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
We're discussing some Hare Krishna bloke that wrote a book of bullshit.
You decided that a debate on evolution supported your claims that evolution isn't true, for some reason.
I pointed out that it didn't. You got upset.

What's ssje?
Click to expand...

That should have said sake

So you don't know, thanks for clearing that up

Typical of you, backed into a corner so change the conversation

Same old pnp
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Can't you just answer the question for once?

So he was not a creationist and is an evolutionist?

Yet he questioned the basic presumptions of evolution

Or how about romers gap? Is that creationist nollox?
Click to expand...
I did answer the question. You asked what he is. I said he's dead. That's a clear answer.

What basic presumptions of evolution did he question? Stop being evasive.
If you want to discuss something, then just lay out what it is. Your DMD-lite game of 20 questions is utterly boring.

Romer's gap isn't an issue. What problem do you think it causes for evolution?
 
thefanwithnoname said:
That should have said sake

So you don't know, thanks for clearing that up

Typical of you, backed into a corner so change the conversation

Same old pnp
Click to expand...
I've told you exactly what you asked and that's me changing the conversation?
You're the one that changed it. We were discussing that video, then you changed it to something else entirely.
Utterly dishonest.
 
Have you lot just moved the conversation over here from the other thread?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I did answer the question. You asked what he is. I said he's dead. That's a clear answer.

What basic presumptions of evolution did he question? Stop being evasive.
If you want to discuss something, then just lay out what it is. Your DMD-lite game of 20 questions is utterly boring.

Romer's gap isn't an issue. What problem do you think it causes for evolution?
Click to expand...

You said what I posted was creationist bollox, right?

I said is he a creationist, dead or alive wasn't the question

Romers gap IS an issue if you believe it is not creationist and that a fossil gap in evolutionary theory is creationist bollocks

Do you now change your statement that a gap in the fossil record is creationist bollocks?
 
Non-evolutionists take the fossil record more at face value. Instead of hypothesising a large number of Precambrian animals for which there is no fossil evidence, they take the fossil record to show that the Cambrian animals did not evolve gradually from a common ancestor, and came into being through intelligent design.

Just saying like.
 
thefanwithnoname said:
You said what I posted was creationist bollox, right?

I said is he a creationist, dead or alive wasn't the question

Romers gap IS an issue if you believe it is not creationist and that a fossil gap in evolutionary theory is creationist bollocks

Do you now change your statement that a gap in the fossil record is creationist bollocks?
Click to expand...
It is creationist bollocks. None of the things that you posted are actual problems with evolution.

Romer's gap wouldn't be an issue even if it wasn't being bridged.
Recent discoveries are doing just that, though.

You're throwing out things that you don't understand, because you've read them somewhere.
They're not actual issues for the science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back