You must log in or register to see media
Frank de Boer, wearing a mixture of confusion and anger, apparently.
Is that supposed to be a smile?
You must log in or register to see media
Frank de Boer, wearing a mixture of confusion and anger, apparently.
Is that supposed to be a smile?
You must log in or register to see media
Frank de Boer, wearing a mixture of confusion and anger, apparently.
Is that supposed to be a smile?


The problem was we also had Lampard and England managers would insist on playing both of them, which most fans felt had never worked. I would have gone for Lampard out of the two and left the other on the bench as a super sub.
That "dilemma" kind of sums up the problems with England since the start of the "golden generation" and England managers in particular. None of them has had the guts to make the big decisions, like playing one or the other of them instead of mucking up the formation to "accommodate" both. And more recently (but it should have been resolved years ago) the problem of dropping Rooney - instead of again messing up the rest of the team to keep him in. And I also guess that is just the type of manager the FA want.
Thought I would be able to guess who you are referring to, but this opened up the list too wide!!a player superior to both of them

That "dilemma" kind of sums up the problems with England since the start of the "golden generation" and England managers in particular. None of them has had the guts to make the big decisions, like playing one or the other of them instead of mucking up the formation to "accommodate" both. And more recently (but it should have been resolved years ago) the problem of dropping Rooney - instead of again messing up the rest of the team to keep him in. And I also guess that is just the type of manager the FA want.
Scholes?The biggest travesty of the whole Gerrard/Lampard saga was that a player superior to both of them ended up playing most games as a left winger, despite being right footed and having very little pace, which was a major contributing factor to his early retirement from international football.
The biggest travesty of the whole Gerrard/Lampard saga was that a player superior to both of them ended up playing most games as a left winger, despite being right footed and having very little pace, which was a major contributing factor to his early retirement from international football.

Then when he retired we shoe horned another player who preferred to play through the middle into that left sided role.
The great shame is that the 2 of them could and should have been able to play in the same side but we never had a manager work out that it had to be in something other than a 4 4 2
Also a shocking lack of pace throughout the side - but in all honesty with that much technical talent and at the slower pace of intl football, that really shouldn't be an issue. Look at the all-conquering Spain side that won 3 tournaments back to back. Apart from Torres in his prime, no-one stands out as having electric pace.Can some fecker put me out of my misery and tell me who the feck you're talking about!!![]()

Bastards! You're all bastards!!!
![]()

Of course!!! Why didn't I realise?It's Barton. We're talking about Joey Barton.![]()


Of course!!! Why didn't I realise?
![]()

That team could have played together (with a 'keeper) c.2004, although some would have been late 20s by then.It's interesting you mention that, as I sometimes think that the 'Golden Generation' would've been better served playing one of the more 'modern' formations that have popped up in the last few seasons. I would've gone with 4-2-3-1 as:
Neville Ferdinand Terry Cole
Gerrard Butt
Beckham Scholes Lampard
Rooney
EDIT: Looking back at that team, I realise that I may have mixed players from two different 'eras'Also a shocking lack of pace throughout the side - but in all honesty with that much technical talent and at the slower pace of intl football, that really shouldn't be an issue. Look at the all-conquering Spain side that won 3 tournaments back to back. Apart from Torres in his prime, no-one stands out as having electric pace.
Perhaps the bigger problem was the total lack of a decent left footed midfielder born between Penzance and Carlisle - Trevor Sinclair being the closest we ever had to an 'option' over there. Scholes was shifted over for the simple reason that he was far more gifted than Lampard or Gerrard, and various managers reasoned that he would 'cope' more capably than they out of position. For all his talent, you simply cannot play at the highest level with even a single player out of position and get away with it. As we found out after Harry shoe-horned Modric onto the same flank, you get to a point where the opposition will expose and exploit the imbalance relentlessly.
It's interesting you mention that, as I sometimes think that the 'Golden Generation' would've been better served playing one of the more 'modern' formations that have popped up in the last few seasons. I would've gone with 4-2-3-1 as:
Neville Ferdinand Terry Cole
Gerrard Butt
Beckham Scholes Lampard
Rooney
EDIT: Looking back at that team, I realise that I may have mixed players from two different 'eras'Also a shocking lack of pace throughout the side - but in all honesty with that much technical talent and at the slower pace of intl football, that really shouldn't be an issue. Look at the all-conquering Spain side that won 3 tournaments back to back. Apart from Torres in his prime, no-one stands out as having electric pace.
That team could have played together (with a 'keeper) c.2004, although some would have been late 20s by then.
The problem with it - as with all England teams for generations- is the likelihood that it would be found wanting without the ball. How would they ever get the ball back from Spain?