World war 3

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe you saw it it a dream,go back sleep and see if it was. Clint Eastwood can do the shot and so can,Bruce willis but not many others <laugh>.
You won't see it in a movie & you'll struggle to find it on t'web. Research the consequences of the shot I describe an a wee light should come on in your head. I say should, but .....

You could ask your fellow members of the Flat Earth Society, but I doubt if they'll be able to help you.
 
You won't see it in a movie & you'll struggle to find it on t'web. Research the consequences of the shot I describe an a wee light should come on in your head. I say should, but .....

You could ask your fellow members of the Flat Earth Society, but I doubt if they'll be able to help you.
All three would have to be standing face on moving very slowly or standing still,and the police would need to be lying down with sniper rifles,in other words not going to happen.
 
All three would have to be standing face on moving very slowly or standing still,and the police would need to be lying down with sniper rifles,in other words not going to happen.
Not true. They've been trained in head shots using regular weapons.

And the mouth shot describes a principle - it's the cortex that must be severed to prevent post mortem spasm - so it can be effected at any angle. But head on is the best and surest. If the cortex is not severed, the hand will automatically spasm, releasing the dead man's switch.

Your chums at the Daily Mail revealed that this training had been given by the SAS. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ead-chiefs-insist-s-no-shoot-kill-policy.html

Take it up with them if you don't believe me.
 
Well I do actually you bored us all once telling us your work record with IBM I think it was.your not in the SAS now or in the future as your too fookin old.
Did I say I was in the SAS? There you go, making it up again. With skills like this you should stand for parliament wearing your blue rosette - or if you fail, you could compose some fairy stories for the Daily Mail.
 
Did I say I was in the SAS? There you go, making it up again. With skills like this you should stand for parliament wearing your blue rosette - or if you fail, you could compose some fairy stories for the Daily Mail.
Are you going senile,Show me where I have ever said you were in the SAS.I Await your apology.
 
Are you going senile,Show me where I have ever said you were in the SAS.I Await your apology.
Perhaps you'll apologise to me after reading post [HASHTAG]#246[/HASHTAG]? In response to me questioning what you know about my past, present & future, you replied that you know I'm not in the SAS now, nor will I be in the future. By omission, it's an easy inference to be taken that you believe I was in the past, otherwise why just specify 2 of the 3 periods? You wrote it - you should know.
 
Now your saying it cant be done,it was easy to train all the police to do it 10 minutes back.<laugh><laugh><laugh><doh><doh>
**** me gently!!! Where on earth do you get that from???? <doh>

I clearly said I'd like to see that film, but doubt that it actually exists, as you usually spout unfounded nonsense. Clearly it doesn't exist, otherwise you would have told me what it was.

I'm getting very weary of this nonsense, Chesh. I see it as a personal attack, which is unwelcome. Now if I was talking rubbish, it would be fair game. But I give you out-loud reasoning, links, etc., and all you do is ignore it & start another wave of tosh. Not one solid piece of evidence have you provided to bolster your 'arguments'. This is not banter. You keep your wee fantasy world to yourself. I want no part of it, as you just won't listen, no matter what solid evidence is provided. And going by this latest retort, you're reading words you want to read so you can launch another tirade. Enough is enough. No-one wants to read this tosh, particularly me.
 
Perhaps you'll apologise to me after reading post [HASHTAG]#246[/HASHTAG]? In response to me questioning what you know about my past, present & future, you replied that you know I'm not in the SAS now, nor will I be in the future. By omission, it's an easy inference to be taken that you believe I was in the past, otherwise why just specify 2 of the 3 periods? You wrote it - you should know.
You assume way too much,no I don't believe you have ever been in the SAS,in fact I find the thought hilarious.Maybe a boy scout or girl guide <laugh>
 
**** me gently!!! Where on earth do you get that from???? <doh>

I clearly said I'd like to see that film, but doubt that it actually exists, as you usually spout unfounded nonsense. Clearly it doesn't exist, otherwise you would have told me what it was.

I'm getting very weary of this nonsense, Chesh. I see it as a personal attack, which is unwelcome. Now if I was talking rubbish, it would be fair game. But I give you out-loud reasoning, links, etc., and all you do is ignore it & start another wave of tosh. Not one solid piece of evidence have you provided to bolster your 'arguments'. This is not banter. You keep your wee fantasy world to yourself. I want no part of it, as you just won't listen, no matter what solid evidence is provided. And going by this latest retort, you're reading words you want to read so you can launch another tirade. Enough is enough. No-one wants to read this tosh, particularly me.
Your the one talking total rubbish,from Corbyn not being a friend of the IRA to the shots through the throat rubbish,which IMO is very close to being impossible with a dark skinned person running at night and the police using semi automatic machine guns not Sniper rifles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.