We could set up a friendly with SANTA Lucia![]()
There would probably be a large sell on CLAUS in his contract
................coat
We could set up a friendly with SANTA Lucia![]()
I liked him when he was here, a player who I always thought gave 100% and showed passion, but I wouldn't want him back now. I'd rather The Murphy's twins play instead, think it's about time we give the youngsters a chance.I despair with City fans. In a poll on whether we should re-sign Snodgrass, 58% say we should. So, get rid of Jacob then, fast, able to use both feet, young, for one footed, slow ex player. Who I have never been a great fan of by the way.
That's SOOO typical of many City fans - probably the same ones who voted for PL to return as our HC.I despair with City fans. In a poll on whether we should re-sign Snodgrass, 58% say we should. So, get rid of Jacob then, fast, able to use both feet, young, for one footed, slow ex player. Who I have never been a great fan of by the way.


Way too much heart and nowhere near enough head / common sense / savvy / nous shown by city fans in some of these tedious online polls. We've moved on, so has he (twice!) so let's let it lie![]()


I guess 'Archie' is just doing them so they have something to fill the sports pages the following day.
Seems odd that the percentages in favour of both PL & Snoddy to return were very similar!!!
We MUST look to the future - NOT dwell in the past!!!
Part of looking to the future is surely trying to get back to the PL next season before the parachut payments finish. I believe Snoddy is better than any winger we currently have so, arguably he would be a great addition for the future of our club. Not so good for Murphy development but NCFC's future is better served by the PL coffers than one or more Murphy getting more limited game time.
But as I said in my other post, there aint a chance in hell it'll happen.
Bah!

Snodgrass isn't going to happen because we can't afford him and don't need him or any other wingers, IMO. Our days of paying big fees for players on high wages are gone. The rumours of Watkins on a free are strengthening with mention now of a 3 year contract being negotiated. A good attacking CM who can play up front as well for a sign on fee and reasonable wages makes far more sense, though it won't be announced until his contract runs out at the end of June.
http://www.insidewelshfootball.co.uk/cardiff-city-miss-target-rivals-close/
He can play WR, DH, but has only done so twice for Barnsley this last season, as I said earlier before this thread went off into a lot of jokes about the name Marley. Here it is again (the info is from Whoscored):
Watkins seems to be a strong rumour with Paddy Davitt not even using the rumour word. Instead we get:
"Norwich City have moved into pole position to sign former Barnsley attacker Marley Watkins".
Watkins isn't really a winger though. This season at Barnsley he has played 19 games on the right in CM, 13 games as a striker and only 2 games at WR. He's not a strong crosser but is quick, tall (6'1"), and can score from range, with his head or by dribbling through defenses. He had 10 goals and 7 assists in 34 starts and 8 sub appearances. He might be seen as a replacement for Dorrans (who has been rumoured with a move to Scotland) and a third option as striker. Terry Butcher, his manager at Inverness, said of him: “He is quick, has a lovely touch, he is immensely strong and good in the air. He is a nice lad too, I never had a problem with him – he was a pleasure to work with. He has got unbelievable potential and is hungry to succeed.”
This compilation gives a reasonable view of his strengths:
You must log in or register to see media
Watkins isn't really a winger though. This season at Barnsley he has played 19 games on the right in CM
Ideally we need an upgrade on Tettey, not another who - like Naismith, Wes, etc can be forced out wide right, wide left, etc. Let's sign the type of player we actually need, not be all extravagant and overload positions we don't need toBased on Whoscored and transfermarkt, that's been on the right of a flat midfield 4. Whether you want to describe his role as a winger or wide midfield, he's not played in the centre of the park in the way Dorrans has. He's not going to replace a sitting midfielder. I appreciate he's not necessarily the same sort of player as the Murphy's who are out-and-out wingers, but equally he's nothing like Dorrans.


Based on Whoscored and transfermarkt, that's been on the right of a flat midfield 4. Whether you want to describe his role as a winger or wide midfield, he's not played in the centre of the park in the way Dorrans has. He's not going to replace a sitting midfielder. I appreciate he's not necessarily the same sort of player as the Murphy's who are out-and-out wingers, but equally he's nothing like Dorrans.
Ideally we need an upgrade on Tettey, not another who - like Naismith, Wes, etc can be forced out wide right, wide left, etc. Let's sign the type of player we actually need, not be all extravagant and overload positions we don't need to
I hope Webber is going to 'stir it up' and not leave us 'waiting in vain' for a solid DM shield to protect the back four![]()
Hence my observation about an upgrade on Tettey, who can break up play while leaving Dorrans, Howson, Thompson etc (if they all staybut I'm not sure that he, or even Godfrey are enough at DM.