I would hope not.
brb's ruling actually works in my favour. Pixie, Skiddy, Bambi, and Afro Stan (among several others) will be ****ting in their pants, knowing full well I can wum at will, and they cannot simply jump in, unannounced, and derail with their usual bollocks! No more "Saints is HIAG's sock!" and other assorted dickheaded mantras!
Brother Spurly is now free from Skiddy's trolling.
Oh, brave new World!
So badly affected.
So badly affected.
However, you've got this wrong mate. What it means is that if you wum and somebody points out where you've ****ed up, you will simply have to accept it and apologise.
Should you throw your toys out of the pram and start arguing, hoisting the Picard of defeat, call the old bill, threaten legal action, post 3am rants etc. Then brb will ban your ass .... again![]()
My guess is Sainthiag08 it was a brutal mauling which I missed but ruined my keyboard this morning on the catch up.Crying to the mods ffs.
****ing pussy whoever did that

This is true but who makes the most obbessessive threads that beg shooting down?If I read brb's post correctly, his warning applied equally to all those mentioned!?
This is true but who makes the most obbessessive threads that beg shooting down?
How can you not? its tantamount to saying i'm a cnut please call me a cnut. If he doesn't like it like he says then why but yourself in the firing line unnecessarily?Yes, he creates various threads that can be construed as 'attention seeking'. However, those who respond to every one with the same boring barrage of abuse are equally guilty.
Yes, he creates various threads that can be construed as 'attention seeking'. However, those who respond to every one with the same boring barrage of abuse are equally guilty.
2 wrongs don't make a right - if Hiag didn't start them then "they" wouldn't respond.
Hiag won't stop until brb bans him, and when that happens all the **** will stop
It would be nice to get back to good footy banter without the needy ones me, me, me dramas.2 wrongs don't make a right - if Hiag didn't start them then "they" wouldn't respond.
Hiag won't stop until brb bans him, and when that happens all the **** will stop
2 wrongs don't make a right - if Hiag didn't start them then "they" wouldn't respond.
Hiag won't stop until brb bans him, and when that happens all the **** will stop
How can you not? its tantamount to saying i'm a cnut please call me a cnut. If he doesn't like it like he says then why but yourself in the firing line unnecessarily?
It would be nice to get back to good footy banter without the needy ones me, me, me dramas.

If the crap wind up threads are not posted there's no vehicles for the **** to be thrown.HIAG has already said he plans to continue wumming on every thread. He thinks this entitles him to his dream of dishing it out and not getting any back
But I'm pretty sure brb will see who cast the first stone if this happens.
HIAG has already said he plans to continue wumming on every thread. He thinks this entitles him to his dream of dishing it out and not getting any back
But I'm pretty sure brb will see who cast the first stone if this happens.
You don't get irony do you Spaniard? He posted that because he knew we was going to seal the premiership title and didn't want to get any flack for all the crap predictions he has concocted.I'm not sure how posting a thread about a truce, or who's easiest to wind up constitutes a personal insult to you!?
It seems to me that whatever Hiag posts is gleefully leapt upon by his pack of pursuers, and used as a pretext to hurl more abuse.
Well, if he ignores what brb has said, he'll have to pay the consequences then!...

You don't get irony do you Spaniard? He posted that because he knew we was going to seal the premiership title and didn't want to get any flack for all the crap predictions he has concocted.
HIAG has already said he plans to continue wumming on every thread. He thinks this entitles him to his dream of dishing it out and not getting any back
But I'm pretty sure brb will see who cast the first stone if this happens.