9/ Snodgrass dive v Palace! Never a penalty!
Oh wait!
Oh wait!


The ludicrous thing is, I expect the useless ****s to uphold the red for Niasse. Such is the ridiculousness of the FA.
They say it evens its self up, but its impossible for that to happen with the remaining games.
MOTD showed a closeup of the Watfud players sock.
I admit that the tackle looked innocuous until the tear in the sock was shown.
That may have been what persuaded the ref to show the red card
and i don't know whether that was what caused the rip anyway.
Sock was in pristine condition immediately before the foot contacted his leg so how was it ripped?
Maybe one for the Conspiracy Thread.
did we see it torn after the challenge or after the match? either way, it had enough pad behind it to fend off a nail bomb.
... send whoever is in midfield out with a rip in their socks and when we get a seemingly innocuous tackle, get Marco to teach the players to scream loudly and hold the area of the rip, whether thats where they've been kicked or not..Immediately after the challenge and it was shown ripped above the pad and below the knee.
The ludicrous thing is, I expect the useless ****s to uphold the red for Niasse. Such is the ridiculousness of the FA.
I think they will.
High foot, studs showing - they'll back the ref and then give him the FA Cup Final
Perhaps he came onto the field with a rip in the sock...Who said it was torn by the Niasse 'challenge' ?MOTD showed a closeup of the Watfud players sock.
I admit that the tackle looked innocuous until the tear in the sock was shown.
That may have been what persuaded the ref to show the red card
This^ And remember, that rip in his sock would only have taken Niasse's stud to have caught the sock itself, which is exactly how it looked.The rip on the sock is at the side.Even more proof that there was next to no contact.