Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Watching Southampton v City...the idea that any of our players would want to leave us to join them is very weird.
City do not look like a team who spent £170m last summer and have a selection of world class players and the best manager in the world. The look a pretty good top four team but no more than that.

I'm watching too. There's some good movement going forwards but a generally poor Southampton have got at them in response. I wouldn't want a single one of their defensive players.

They'll probably win this but I wouldn't put money on it.

Redmond has been very disappointing given that he's up against Jesus Navas at right back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
I'm watching too. There's some good movement going forwards but a generally poor Southampton have got at them in response. I wouldn't want a single one of their defensive players.

They'll probably win this but I wouldn't put money on it.

Redmond has been very disappointing given that he's up against Jesus Navas at right back.

Me and my daughter were just saying that Redmond has been very poor.
Surprised that Southampton have been so off the pace.
 
I'm watching too. There's some good movement going forwards but a generally poor Southampton have got at them in response. I wouldn't want a single one of their defensive players.

They'll probably win this but I wouldn't put money on it.

Redmond has been very disappointing given that he's up against Jesus Navas at right back.
Jesus<doh>
It is Easter, but he's no right back.
Christ
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
At my school, we sat at old style wooden desks (really), which were set out in rows of five. Your place was determined by your position in class (there were no qualms about ranking kids then based on their performances in term and exam). So 1st to 5th sat on the first row, 6th to 10th on the second. That meant 2nd and 7th sat adjacent to each other. 2nd was clever, nearly top of the class whereas 7th was aspiring to be clever, but a bit off the pace. 7th invariably glanced across to the right, hoping to crib from whatever 2nd was writing down.
You can see where the analogy is going.
Who thought Arsenal would be sat there, glancing across trying to emulate what Spurs are doing?!
They've been doing that since they caught the Woolwich Ferry on their way north.