In my opinion he is probably the best analysist anywhere on the box. A real surprise considering what a bellend he was as a player.
In my opinion he is probably the best analysist anywhere on the box. A real surprise considering what a bellend he was as a player.
Totally agree, Gary Neville really surprised me how unbiased he is even when covering Utd. games. Shame his brother doesn't have a similar number of brain cells.I do like him as an analyst, but he's nowhere near as good as Gary Neville in my opinion.
I also liked him as a player (Jenas that is, not Neville).
I thought he was absolute dross as a player and a bland pundit. Clearly had ability but had an unnerving skill to play central midfield for 90 minutes and seemingly never be anywhere near the ball.
21 England caps. Astonishing.
Danny Murphy comes across very good.
Danny Murphy comes across very good.
I'm with you chaps re Jonas. Neville is head and shoulders this best pundit out there at the moment and has the credentials to back it up too. Don't mind Alan Smith either but largely because he just comes across as a thoroughly decent chap.I'm with you on this Watford. He rarely has anything interesting to say.
What about the women pundits? Concise, great readers of the game, excellent knowledge of all aspects of the game, balanced, and thoughtful insight. All terms that cannot be applied to them.
What about the women pundits? Concise, great readers of the game, excellent knowledge of all aspects of the game, balanced, and thoughtful insight. All terms that cannot be applied to them.
Your are.I'll be in the minority, but I like Garth Crooks views