I believe that the Hampshire Senior Cup final is at St Mary's this season and that will also need to be factored in although I think this is later in April. The semi finals are this week with Winchester away to Basingstoke.
Who is in the other semi?
I believe that the Hampshire Senior Cup final is at St Mary's this season and that will also need to be factored in although I think this is later in April. The semi finals are this week with Winchester away to Basingstoke.
Who is in the other semi?
Hartley Wintney v AFC Bournemouth. (The latter obviously being the youth players from the Premier League team as opposed to the Poppies.)
Thanks. Poppies still going? I didn't realise that Hartley Witney had a team at a decent level.
I was jinxed by the Hampshire Cup Final
For the Utd game, the next available midweek for them seems to be Tues 11/Weds 12 April. But that gets taken off the table if Utd progress past Rostov. It would then be Tues 25/Weds 26 April, which would be unaffected by EL (or FA Cup for that matter - albeit with no QF replays, that's irrelevant now anyway).
As for Arsenal game, assuming they get knocked out by Bayern, then the same two weeks as above are option, together with the weeks of Tues 14/Weds 15 March and Tues 18/Weds 19 April.
The caveat to the above though is that there are CL matches on Tues 14/Weds 15 March, Tues 11/Weds 12 April and Tues 18/Weds 19 April - and UEFA don't tend to like non-European matches taking place alongside CL matches. But due to logistics, UEFA might have to lump it - exhibit A being Man City v Stoke this coming Wednesday.
Utd might well have to win the EL to qualify for CL football next year, because going deep in all three cup competitions will be a nightmare of a fixture pile-up for them. Especially when compared to someone like Liverpool.
In what way did puel treat fonte badly? None of us really know what went on but lets still post on a forum about puel treating fonte bad anyway .people posting rumours as facts is slightly annoyingThe players all seem to be very positive about him - the exception obviously been Fonte who was treated pretty poorly by Puel. I cannot see the notorious diamond being re-introduced and I think that he will be allowed to play the more entertaining style in to next season. At least it is unlikely that he will be poached on the summer albeit I think he will eventually return to France. Seeing that we will not be playing in Europe next season, he will not need to revert to the extensive rotating and it will be interesting to see what he ultimately considers to be his best starting eleven. Since the excessive rotation has stopped and we have had consistency, he have played better. I would like to see some stability even though I would have suggested prior to January that retaining him would have been a risk. He deserves another season but I also hope that there are not too many changes in the playing staff as well.
In what way did puel treat fonte badly? None of us really know what went on but lets still post on a forum about puel treating fonte bad anyway .people posting rumours as facts is slightly annoying
I was more pointing out that the poster said puel treated fonte pretty badly when none of us know how puel treated jose.but i get what you are saying.According to MLT [who isn't the gospel, I'm just saying], Fonte wasn't the best behaved after he returned from the Euro Championship. But maybe something provoked him. Who knows.? He'd been a good servant to the club, but he'd been well paid too.
Anyway, in comparison, Cedric's behaviour appears to have been exemplary. That's just my opinion, but what do I know.
I was more pointing out that the poster said puel treated fonte pretty badly when none of us know how puel treated jose.but i get what you are saying.
This said poster, has had an agenda against Puel since we appointed him...
No ****? I hadn't noticed. Prat
I read that as Lambo insulting the original poster, not you, SF86...Did that make you feel better? Insulting me.
That's what I thought as well.I read that as Lambo insulting the original poster, not you, SF86...
Because the diamond didn't work and the rotation policy was of limited success.![]()
There seem to be a lot of personal insults flying about on this site lately and I wonder whether we are metamorphosing into SW which we all enjoy mocking. It got so bad the other day that even I apologised and that has never been heard of before.
The rotation policy that got a team without an in form striker to Wembley WITHOUT CONCEDING A GOAL you mean?
There were in the Wessex League a few seasons ago when we beat them and I think they are still in the same Sydenhams league. I was surprised that Harley Wintney had progressed but they play in a different league fir teams in the North of the county and in to Surrey. They beat Totton in the previous round, I believe.
Last season Winchester lost to Havant & Waterlooville on penalties in the final - quite an achievement because of the (then) two league difference between the teams,
I read that as Lambo insulting the original poster, not you, SF86...