So far 10 flukey points and two byes to the Semi final of the cup, nice one.
I feel that the "Cosmic joker" is setting the Goons up for some FA Cup WUMmery to
add to this seasons' PL/CL grief ...
So far 10 flukey points and two byes to the Semi final of the cup, nice one.
You really need to watch this again, glacial speed may have something to do with the film being in slow motion.You must log in or register to see mediaThe Chelsea game shows just how important decisions are. Swansea were denied a 10/10 handball, and one going at slow speed at that, with the score at 1-1. If they get it, their chances of winning are pretty good, and a draw or better must be in the 9/10 range. Of course it might merely have amounted to a blip, but when you consider the knock-on effects on confidence, it could be the difference between Chelsea winning the league and Swansea being relegated. Azpilicueta's hand goes forward and meets the ball while it travels at a glacial pace and his arm is fully extended. He even slaps downward with his hand. And yet a rocket going off Rose's tucked elbow is given...
This site is far worse than the mouser board has ever been for whinging about ref decisions (except in your/their favour) and I never thought that would be possible.
You really need to watch this again, glacial speed may have something to do with the film being in slow motion.
Yes his arm is extended (he is intending to push off his opponent to assist his turning, foul, possibly), yes his arm/hand slaps down but not at the ball, it is a consequence of missing his intended push.
the ball hits his upper arm after a cute heel by the attacker, intentional, no, a penalty, probably.
This site is far worse than the mouser board has ever been for whinging about ref decisions (except in your/their favour) and I never thought that would be possible.
Try watching all games as 2 teams you have never seen before, the reffing may surprise you quite a bit when you have no axe to grind.
You seem to agree with with my point, but feel that I have exaggerated, as indeed I did. As to the rest of your post, we all have our faults. Some whinge too much, others cross the line between disagreeing with what people have to say and finding fault with them personally. The latter tends to produce heat rather than light, IMO, and leads to exchanges which are an unpleasant waste of time.You really need to watch this again, glacial speed may have something to do with the film being in slow motion.
Yes his arm is extended (he is intending to push off his opponent to assist his turning, foul, possibly), yes his arm/hand slaps down but not at the ball, it is a consequence of missing his intended push.
the ball hits his upper arm after a cute heel by the attacker, intentional, no, a penalty, probably.
This site is far worse than the mouser board has ever been for whinging about ref decisions (except in your/their favour) and I never thought that would be possible.
Try watching all games as 2 teams you have never seen before, the reffing may surprise you quite a bit when you have no axe to grind.
After seeing you lot benefit again from **** decisions i get why you defend refsYou really need to watch this again, glacial speed may have something to do with the film being in slow motion.
Yes his arm is extended (he is intending to push off his opponent to assist his turning, foul, possibly), yes his arm/hand slaps down but not at the ball, it is a consequence of missing his intended push.
the ball hits his upper arm after a cute heel by the attacker, intentional, no, a penalty, probably.
This site is far worse than the mouser board has ever been for whinging about ref decisions (except in your/their favour) and I never thought that would be possible.
Try watching all games as 2 teams you have never seen before, the reffing may surprise you quite a bit when you have no axe to grind.

Most of them are so no real problem there.It would take a couple of seconds for a senior ref with video evidence to have changed those last two decisions (the Chelski handball yesterday, and the Soton "offside" goal today), none of the mythical "slows the game down" crap and more importantly it would be the RIGHT DECISION!!! Why are the authorities (and a lot of pundits) scared of that?
Most of them are so no real problem there.
Just out of interest, have you ever seen Spurs get a "dodgy" decision in their favour and did you complain about it vehemently and often?
If controversial incidents were removed entirely, what would they have to talk about? Their knowledge of football? No wonder they're terrified.It would take a couple of seconds for a senior ref with video evidence to have changed those last two decisions (the Chelski handball yesterday, and the Soton "offside" goal today), none of the mythical "slows the game down" crap and more importantly it would be the RIGHT DECISION!!! Why are the authorities (and a lot of pundits) scared of that?
You do realise that only this and the Liverpool board ever have discussions about "controversial" incidents. other boards must have something else to talk about after all.If controversial incidents were removed entirely, what would they have to talk about? Their knowledge of football? No wonder they're terrified.
Your board has stickied a thread about what people are going to have for dinner.You do realise that only this and the Liverpool board ever have discussions about "controversial" incidents. other boards must have something else to talk about after all.
Not only is that not true, given there's one on the Chav board, but it's a bit rich from someone whose board has a thread that is literally talking ****: http://not606.com/threads/ibs.343785/You do realise that only this and the Liverpool board ever have discussions about "controversial" incidents. other boards must have something else to talk about after all.
Your board has stickied a thread about what people are going to have for dinner.
Two fine examples that show others have things to talk about without contentious decisions.Not only is that not true, given there's one on the Chav board, but it's a bit rich from someone whose board has a thread that is literally talking ****: http://not606.com/threads/ibs.343785/

Except that it doesn't. Anyone who actually looked at our board for three seconds would know that.Two fine examples that show others have things to talk about without contentious decisions.
Thank you both![]()
Did you see your cup final thread?You do realise that only this and the Liverpool board ever have discussions about "controversial" incidents. other boards must have something else to talk about after all.