Or at least have him do our press conferences.and Ranieri in !!![]()
![]()
![]()
Southampton FC are just there to make up the numbers. And so are Everton FC, Bournemouth, Stoke and West Ham.
So are Portsmouth, Chesterfield and Sheffield Wednesday.
We are all equal, in that we are all equally here just to make up the numbers. Frankly the only clubs that matter are Manchester United, City, Chelski, Arsenal and Liverpool. The rest of us are just there to provide opposition, players and fixtures and someone to show on TV when they're playing one of the clubs that matter. Maybe a little bit of excitement when one of us pointless clubs beat one of the teams that matter allowing the Premier League to market itself in China to gain more money to give to Manchester United, City, Chelski, Arsenal and Liverpool. Aside from that, not at all. Every season is more pointless than the last as all but a few clubs hurtle towards a meaningless position in the league table, unless you get relegated or reach Europe and if it's the Europa League, you don't even care anyway. Regardless, finish 5-17 does it matter? Does it matter the season after that? Or the season after that? What are you progressing towards? What's the end goal? Winning the Premier League? Ha, fat chance. Not unless you want to fire up the cash furnace, make sure you have enough cash to incinerate though. What good is a five year plan when a team can just buy their way into the top 4 and the media metaphorically suck them off while they do it? What's the point in playing a game where all the die are loaded?
Before anyone mentions Leicester, that was a total fluke and will never happen again.
A lot have already said it....Money is the root of all evil............Getting Sky to put the money in was one thing............but the throw back was catastrophic for the top teams (and lower teams) in turn because as the money came in, the costs went up drastically. In truth the fans only gained because if they paid even more they could watch the favourite team on the goggle box.
When it all kicked off there were cries of "the gates would go down" As we all know though, the gates are actually increasing.
Personally I do not yet think it is over, there is more to come. There has been talk of the European super league, it will come in at some stage I am convinced. Which will mean as is the trend beginning to show now the top teams are actually developing two full teams.
A new term creeping in of course is "Rotation" Naturally with that comes yet another increase in costs.
How many games a week can the average man afford I wonder? Me I can barely afford one.....but then maybe you can afford more.
Champions league, Europe league, FA cup and EFL cup are our possible extra games. In theory I guess it could be in the region of 60 games a season. I know I couldn't afford to attend them all and what of the players? Are we beginning to see top teams having to play 70 plus games a season at the top level (Obviously including possible replays and pre-seaon) Does that mean top teams are going to have 3 levels of players....the mind boggles at the thought........all in the name of money!!
Be easy on the OP. Wouldn't you be pissed off with life if you were a Pompey fan. The fans he detests most are having the time of their lives while he has to hang about with the other dregs of the football league.
Be careful, Godders!! Not so long ago, Saints were also part of that "pond life." And I think many a Saints fan enjoyed the visits to places of relative obscurity like Walsall.
Not the 1-0 defeat I didn't![]()
Be careful, Godders!! Not so long ago, Saints were also part of that "pond life." And I think many a Saints fan enjoyed the visits to places of relative obscurity like Walsall.