Off Topic FREE HIAG

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should HIAG be Banned?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't care.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Make sure you keep a spare pair of shreddies close by, because you will piss yourself - guaranteed!

I did.

It's great that you can laugh at yourself mate, we all do.

And it's much better than crying about Nasty Pixie all the time, that **** makes you look like a right pussy :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
It's great that you can laugh at yourself mate, we all do.

And it's much better than crying about Nasty Pixie all the time, that **** makes you look like a right pussy :)

Shouldn't you be blubbing to a supermod and grassing up some poor bastard?
 
Shouldn't you be blubbing to a supermod and grassing up some poor bastard?

You're not really in a position to be crying about asking the supermod for a ban are you now ? <laugh>

How many times was it you called for me to be banned again ?
 
Who has the best ability to get a ban put in place ... a regular poster or a mod .

Irrelevant really. If you're going to complain complain about somebody asking for a ban, then it's probably best not to have a history of demanding that people are banned every time a wum goes tits up.
 
Who has the best ability to get a ban put in place ... a regular poster or a mod .

Roofie, what do you think of a so-called mod, not only blubbing to a supermod, but doing it behind everyone's back AND (this is the real kicker) on a complete pack of lies in order to get the poor unsuspecting bastard banned?

Does that sound to you like someone you would like to spend any kind of time with?
 
Irrelevant really. If you're going to complain complain about somebody asking for a ban, then it's probably best not to have a history of demanding that people are banned every time a wum goes tits up.
Well in your own words , HAIG tried to get bans put in place multible , multable ... lots of times ,with total failure while you got him banned after how many tries ?
 
Well in your own words , HAIG tried to get bans put in place multible , multable ... lots of times ,with total failure while you got him banned after how many tries ?

Don't fall into Pixie's trap, Roofie. I didn't try to get people banned "multiple" times. The only incident to which Pixie can be referring was limited to one incident, on one thread, and it was played out in the open.

The differences between the two situations are stark and for all to see.

(1) I did my call for bans out in the open, in front of my peers. There was nothing sneaky, snide, grassing-up going on.
(2) I clearly set out my reasons for suggesting a ban.
(3) I didn't lie.
(4) I didn't abuse a position of trust and integrity.

Now you can see why it is that Pixie was so roundly condemned by his peers, including fellow mods, even Pixie, himself (after his craven cowardice was discovered and exposed). The supermod who was duped into banning me set my ban aside a full 4 days ahead of schedule, so discussed was he by Pixie's treachery. There was a point when the said supermod was considering a ban for Pixie. That would have been justice indeed - even if Pixie served the remainder of the term that had been given me (although twice my length of term would have been more reasonable and totally justified).

The thing is, though, Roofie, I am the bigger man. I have forgiven Pixie and moved on, mate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
About time you was the bigger man and forgave Piskie, well done Hiag didn't think I was going to hear it from you.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Don't fall into Pixie's trap, Roofie. I didn't try to get people banned "multiple" times. The only incident to which Pixie can be referring was limited to one incident, on one thread, and it was played out in the open.

The differences between the two situations are stark and for all to see.

(1) I did my call for bans out in the open, in front of my peers. There was sneaky, snide, grassing-up going on.
(2) I clearly set out my reasons for suggesting a ban.
(3) I didn't lie.
(4) I didn't abuse a position of trust and integrity.

Now you can see why it is that Pixie was so roundly condemned by his peers, including fellow mods, even Pixie, himself (after his craven cowardice was discovered and exposed). The supermod who was duped into banning me set my ban aside a full 4 days ahead of schedule, so discussed was he by Pixie's treachery. There was a point when the said supermod was considering a ban for Pixie. That would have been justice indeed - even if Pixie served the remainder of the term that had been given me (although twice my length of term would have been more reasonable and totally justified).

The thing is, though, Roofie, I am the bigger man. I have forgiven Pixie and moved on, mate.
<laugh> Meltdown
 
Don't fall into Pixie's trap, Roofie. I didn't try to get people banned "multiple" times. The only incident to which Pixie can be referring was limited to one incident, on one thread, and it was played out in the open.

The differences between the two situations are stark and for all to see.

(1) I did my call for bans out in the open, in front of my peers. There was sneaky, snide, grassing-up going on.
(2) I clearly set out my reasons for suggesting a ban.
(3) I didn't lie.
(4) I didn't abuse a position of trust and integrity.

Now you can see why it is that Pixie was so roundly condemned by his peers, including fellow mods, even Pixie, himself (after his craven cowardice was discovered and exposed). The supermod who was duped into banning me set my ban aside a full 4 days ahead of schedule, so discussed was he by Pixie's treachery. There was a point when the said supermod was considering a ban for Pixie. That would have been justice indeed - even if Pixie served the remainder of the term that had been given me (although twice my length of term would have been more reasonable and totally justified).

The thing is, though, Roofie, I am the bigger man. I have forgiven Pixie and moved on, mate.

You must log in or register to see images
 
I note that in my last post I made a typographical error with one of the points.

Because this is so important, I thought it best to clarify matters, so here is the relevant part of that post, with the error corrected.


The differences between the two situations are stark and for all to see.

(1) I did my call for bans out in the open, in front of my peers. There was nothing sneaky, snide, grassing-up going on.
(2) I clearly set out my reasons for suggesting a ban.
(3) I didn't lie.
(4) I didn't abuse a position of trust and integrity.

The thing is, though, Roofie, I am the bigger man. I have forgiven Pixie and moved on, mate.