True dat...but I couldn't find the poker so just used Paraffin.
Off Topic The Burly Arms
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
True dat...but I couldn't find the poker so just used Paraffin.
Sometimes racism that isn't blatant too but racism nevertheless
I agree the hypocrisy is appalling. Sounds great talking about racism and accusations of criminal activity just sounds a bit ****ty coming from someone who himself has on occasion used the poster as a differentiator and allows a fair few things to pass without his moral compass shooting North.
I find it damn weird how you think that post by SA was not on but spend most of your posts on here trying to get even on Hiag by dipping your toe into his private life on a constant basis. Regardless of whether you think he is bullshitting or not but I forget 'Hiag asks for it' maybe SA thought Skiddy asked for something too, I'm sure deep down SA knows that article is not relevant to Skiddy.
So yeah as much as I agree with your sentiment I think you could do with applying it to yourself too when it comes to others.
P.s NO its not because Hiag is a Spurs fan
I agree with your point on racism ... my intent was to make allowances for some of the occasional 'gentle humour' that occurs on here where there appears to be no malicious intent .. and it's all about the intent.
Differentiation by poster in general terms, and on club bias, is perfectly acceptable ... unless the comments made are themselves unacceptable as alluded to ... that you are trying to make this 'general' rather than in terms of the types of unacceptable behaviour that are the sole focus of my posts reeks of desperation and your obvious discomfort at your occasional sycophancy where Quentin is concerned ...
I find it weird that you want to make special allowances for Quentin ... we all comment about each others 'lives' ... if you can find a post where I accuse HIAG of any criminal activity you might have a point ... you don't. Trying to equate my addressing HIAG's fantasy lifestyle postings with SA83s insinuations of criminal activity towards GM is, quite frankly, childish ... not to mention disappointing. Truly. .
So as long as 'deep down' we know something we can post anything? ... so why on earth have you had such run ins with posters on the Sunderland board in the past? Are you now saying that Billy The Bastard and Amsterdam Roger should be able to post anything without being taken to task? ... If so why did you feel the need to take them to task? ... or might it just be that the comments aimed at GM are acceptable in your book because they are aimed at GM?
.... one thing I hate as much as intolerance is hypocrisy. .
Last edited:
We all like Commie, inside he's a beautiful person who just wants a hug. Outside he's a twat though.
Poor sunderland board getting bashed again.
... I enjoy your board tbf ... I'm just not selective about what I find acceptable ... a twat is a twat ... and SA83 has always been one
You're late to the party, Comm.
Apparently I'm more hated than you now
I suspect the only thing you surpass any other poster on is irrelevance tbf
Fossy calling people twats
I tend to restrict it to calling twats, twats ... you twat
Perhaps you could highlight any one instance of hypocrisy from me on here? once you've looked up its' meaning of course ...
... I enjoy your board tbf ... I'm just not selective about what I find acceptable ... a twat is a twat ... and SA83 has always been one
The safc board is different to most on here.
There's a couple of hideous ****s on your board mate (and I'm not referring to '83 btw)
No I don't think you can post anything. I wouldn't have done a copy and paste..then again I'm not the type to do copy and pastes on things like religions either, which happen to be personal for individuals also. Something I've seen Skiddy do in the past. No doubt you have too because whenever Skiddy drops a clanger a few of his buddies tend to crack on in and around his whopping clanger or totally disappear for a bit(yes I've noticed). In my world someone like that ends up getting a few slaps now and again. That's what he was getting. We all know that article has **** all to do with Skiddy, just like we all know (I think) that I don't go to terrorist classes in order to learn the art of killing innocent human beings due to the faith I follow. Remember them 'bantz'? Truth is I don't care enough to cause the drama, I give a few back and I get on with it or I'm bored enough to ignore it. The accusation on Skiddy comes simply from the fact that he is in Thailand and nothing more, you know that's what it is but you maybe felt the need to stick up and go the extra mile for Skiddy because its Skiddy?
Because for me the outrage should be the same for both 'slurs on someone's personal life' because the moral thought behind both is the same.
and for you to use Billy and Roger (bellends) as a point prover just shows how ultimately its all about you being facking right because any idiot can see the bile behind their comments and Commy too. Just go and check the 'Canada shooting' thread I posted on the Mackem board if you need a refresher of the bigotry on show. You are obviously aware of my run ins with them so you obviously know its been personal.
Yet its not something that bothers you however some dumb arse article we all know isn't anything to do with Skiddy in reality has got you getting biblical.
GTFO...thanks to you Fosse I'm off to have a spliff.
For what its worth I don't think you tolerate hatred or agree with racism etc. Im not on that vibe, i was just making my point that you are just a nobber who goes off on one and forgets his arse from his elbow from time to time lol.
Easy, on the second page of this thread, in your rant about me you made reference to a poster named John Cardew.Perhaps you could highlight any one instance of hypocrisy from me on here? once you've looked up its' meaning of course ...
Yet, you sent me a PM with the title 'apology' and said you hadn't realised what he had done so thought you would apologise.
Short memory, Fosse.
Hypocrite.
How is any of that hypocisy? ... I had not understoof the backround to your feud with that poster and had made a comment about you bringing it onto the Prem board ... I offered an apology when I was made aware of the background to your feud... there is no hypocrisy ... as I said ... look up the meaning first. Unlike some on here, I am always prepared to apologise if I feel I have got something wrong or haven't completely understood the dynamics of something.
Nothing wrong with my memory.
Fool.
.. if the paraphrase is "Fosse isn't perfect" then I'm happy to agree ....but I'll always be consistent ... I don't tolerate intolerance .. and if I think someone is over stepping the mark on a post I'll call it.For me an inference about Brits going on holiday to Thailand etc is fair enough .... but taking the trouble to find whole articles about criminal activity in Thailand (or anywhere else) then combined with follow up inferences suggesting a poster is / might be a "nonce" are not. Particularly as a response to getting your arse kicked on a footie forum around the subject of footballing topics ffs ... sad twat.
It's not all about me ... it's just my opinion ... whether you, or anybody else for that matter, agrees or disagrees is largely irrelevant... but I will continue to bore you with it if I feel the need to
