Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
GCTiger said:
I like the part where he thanks the city fans and his former team mates....oh!?
Click to expand...
why is everyone turning on Snodders?
he had rejected our contract, cos it wasnt long enough and got a better offer at another club... the reason that he didnt wanna train, is cos he didnt want to risk an injury.
Understandable.
 
Personally I think Snodgrass has been a complete and utter cock, engineering a move away. What is the value of a contract these days? They just seem a totally pointless piece of paper amendments to contracts that allow clubs to punish want away or 'striking' players in the wallet.

I would like to see clauses put into contracts right across football that behaviour like this can see a reduction to just 10% of monthly salary. It will soon see the behaviour amongst players change, you don't want to play? Fine, you go to 10% of your total pay and you're here for another 18 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevielidds1983, Fettis the striker, TIGERSCAVE and 2 others
PattyNchips2 said:
why is everyone turning on Snodders?
he had rejected our contract, cos it wasnt long enough and got a better offer at another club... the reason that he didnt wanna train, is cos he didnt want to risk an injury.
Understandable.
Click to expand...

No it's not. He's paid to play and train. Every other player who hopes to get transferred doesn't effectively go on strike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renegadetiger
Hull City AFC (GLP) said:
Personally I think Snodgrass has been a complete and utter cock, engineering a move away. What is the value of a contract these days? They just seem a totally pointless piece of paper amendments to contracts that allow clubs to punish want away or 'striking' players in the wallet.

I would like to see clauses put into contracts right across football that behaviour like this can see a reduction to just 10% of monthly salary. It will soon see the behaviour amongst players change, you don't want to play? Fine, you go to 10% of your total pay and you're here for another 18 months.
Click to expand...

You're too lenient. If he's refusing to train or play he shouldn't get paid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renegadetiger, look_back_in_amber, FER ARK and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back