Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
SydneyTiger14 said:
I am being objective, as I then pointed out, Sunderland who are in just as bad a position as we are - if not worse financially - also managed to get 14m for Van Aanholt who also refused to play/handed in a transfer request.
Click to expand...

PVA is reportedly going for £10m, he's younger, doesn't have a potentially career or at least season ending weak knee hanging over him, has come off the back of a similarly good half a season and is not Scottish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Happy Tiger, cheynetiger and PattyNchips2
personally I thhink it is a loss to lose Snodders cos if MP could get a tune out of him, imagine what MS could do with him.
BUT.. will he be missed? hmm maybe his set-pieces and free kicks.
That Markovic looks like a player that can do the same things that Snodgrass can do.
Have we got an option to buy at the end of the loan period................. Klopp wants him back doesnt he?
 
No all the German said was the doors not closed on him returning ... towels are on the sun loungers though....
 
Only Davies seems to have tweeted about Snodgrass' departure. When Livermore left, a lot of them tweeted.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
I am being objective, as I then pointed out, Sunderland who are in just as bad a position as we are - if not worse financially - also managed to get 14m for Van Aanholt who also refused to play/handed in a transfer request.
Click to expand...

Relegation zone is the one common factor- the fee I haven't seen confirmed.
 
originallambrettaman said:
His agent was emailed a new contract with no discussion and no offer of any meeting, there is no link to prove this, but it is absolutely true.
Click to expand...

Okay, I'll accept that. What was the preamble between agent and club? What was the better outcome for the agent, stay or move? I have a natural distrust of agents, footballers rarelyvget involved in the detail, couldn't care les and follow instruction. It's even worse with fathers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bengals Tiger
SydneyTiger14 said:
We sold Livermore for 10m and haven't spent similar on any replacement.
Click to expand...

****ing hell, you really are trying to come across as a thick ****. 4 days to go yet. Those loans, are they fee and wage free? Why be so judgemental now, when, if you're right, you can crow to your hearts content on the 1st Feb?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PattyNchips2
Fez said:
****ing hell, you really are trying to come across as a thick ****. 4 days to go yet. Those loans, are they fee and wage free? Why be so judgemental now, when, if you're right, you can crow to your hearts content on the 1st Feb?
Click to expand...

a fanny?
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
Or they suck it up and take 25m, which if Snodgrass is the replacement they've still made a profit from?
Click to expand...

<laugh><laugh> What you mean either sell first anď then buy from the proceeds, or 'suck it up' and sell below value?

Now then, where have we seen such a thing lately? <doh>
 
citycityhull said:
Basically Wolves will have to release him from the loan, he then "returns " to his home club and from there he can move on (as per Markovic)
Click to expand...
Isn't that the case for a loan? If we want to buy him, then it's up to the selling club whether he's out on loan or still at their club to sell him in any window
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back