Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
****ing hell, you really are trying to come across as a thick ****. 4 days to go yet. Those loans, are they fee and wage free? Why be so judgemental now, when, if you're right, you can crow to your hearts content on the 1st Feb?
Christ, call me thick but don't even read my post properly. I was responding to someone saying we don't have money to sign a replacement for Snodgrass before he goes. I'm pointing out we do in fact have 10m we've just received to be spent on a replacement.
 
Based on a small amount of rather convincing evidence, it seems that you are correct ... again. I seriously hope so. The agony and the ecstasy of being a City fan do not diminish with distance. Unlike gravity. And stinkiness.
just makes you wonder what MS has to do to make the hissy fitters shut up.
 
April Fools day upcoming. Hull City v West Ham United. If he plays how will he be welcomed?

booed to **** i hope

got injured in his first game, took obscene amounts of money for over a year not playing.. leaves first sign of something 'better'
it's football don't give this oh he did his best for us, **** him
he's a ****

boo the **** out of him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bengals Tiger
snodgrass is a ****
hope he does utter **** at west ham and the west ham fans hate him
 
refusing to train to demand his move.. while pocketing literally millions while injured..

**** for scotland
can **** off hope he never plays for scotland again
 
Similar season? 3 goals 0 assists. Righto. He's also only two and a half years younger.

For a start, after having a look (I thought he'd scored more goals than that) he has got an assist.

But what a daft bloody comment that is, Van Aanholt is a ****ing defender. Snodgrass is a forward. <doh>
 
It's unlikely but I would love it if we finished above west ham! Stick it right up the s**t!!!
Fair enough if you want to leave then ask to leave but the whole refusing to train shows him for what he is!
 
It's unlikely but I would love it if we finished above west ham! Stick it right up the s**t!!!
Fair enough of you want to leave then ask to leave but the whole refusing to train shows him for what he is!

he's an utter ****. will never cheer him for scotland again
 
For a start, after having a look (I thought he'd scored more goals than that) he has got an assist.

But what a daft bloody comment that is, Van Aanholt is a ****ing defender. Snodgrass is a forward. <doh>

Van Aanholt plays as a winger predominantly, he's a bit like Robertson is viewed on here - can't defend but gets forward and scores goals. Only he hasn't really done that much this season.

Lol this was the first article that came up when I googled him: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...r-Patrick-van-Aanholt-goalscoring-winger.html

Yeah yeah, daily fail, etc. But even so, bad defenders going for more than goal scoring wingers is even worse so not sure that helps your case.
 
Isn't that the case for a loan? If we want to buy him, then it's up to the selling club whether he's out on loan or still at their club to sell him in any window
My understanding is that you sign a player on loan and hold his registration for the period of the loan. Therefore the loaning club have to release him.
He can of course be sold by his parent club to another, but the registration to play would still be with the loan club