Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hull City AFC (GLP) said:
I think there'll be a couple more crosses to add before the window shuts.

CityCalv is heading up our sales policy and he'll accept anything within 60-70% of actual market value.
Click to expand...

Maybe I should take on your policies, do not accept any offer ever for any footballer at the club. Sell no one no matter how **** we're doing, keep them all.

Do not sell players to buy new ones, tell the new manager if he doesn't like the **** squad we currently have he can **** off. What a ****er coming in here wanting to buy new players.
 
As far as I'm concerned anybody who leaves the club is past history. The main thing is who is coming in, so considering we've signed 5 (incl. Henriksen) and it's rumoured we'll end up with 8 or 9 who are the other 3 or 4???
 
CityCalv said:
Maybe I should take on your policies, do not accept any offer ever for any footballer at the club. Sell no one no matter how **** we're doing, keep them all.

Do not sell players to buy new ones, tell the new manager if he doesn't like the **** squad we currently have he can **** off. What a ****er coming in here wanting to buy new players.
Click to expand...

<laugh><laugh> By all means sell players. As we're selling them to restructure the squad, or as many believe pay off the Allams. Do you not think maximising the sale value of OUR players is in our best interests? It either gives us more money in the transfer market or covers off more of the debt - dependent on what you think the club are doing with funds.

My feeling is we're getting rid of contracted players and bringing in loans - alarm bells ringing. Part of the fee will be used to cover off wages the remainder no doubt trousered by the dim one.

We now have a situation where we'll have lots of players on loan and only 5 can feature on a match day. I think we'll be worse off at the end of the window than we were at the start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spesupersydera
We played quite well against Chelsea and perhaps we can afford not to have Snodgrass with us. For me it's a maybe. I would rather he stayed, but if he goes and we get others in, I might be happy with it.
 
The Omega Man said:
We played quite well against Chelsea and perhaps we can afford not to have Snodgrass with us. For me it's a maybe. I would rather he stayed, but if he goes and we get others in, I might be happy with it.
Click to expand...
We played very well against Chelsea but our set pieces the set pieces were back to being ****e. No Snodgrass to take them see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
charon-the-ferryman said:
EA' problem is that he'd already ****ed up the bid for the sale of the club by dicking around with offers - i'm assuming he must be happy with £10m for Snodgrass so once Burnley had offered that amount he accepted rather than wait for someone else to come along to increase the bid and risk losing the Burnley offer - he may well have eked out a bit more but he may also have lost the offer from Burnley if no other offer was forthcoming and they had walked
Click to expand...

I have absolutely no idea myself, but could the structure of the bid play as much of a part in how it is viewed, as the size of it?
 
John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. said:
I doubt MS wanted Jake or Snodders to leave, but I don't think he will feel it is a fatal move to his and our hopes of survival. Jake was good, but not irreplaceable. Snodders will be missed, but he doesn't like working back and defending, and MS seems to want to play this high energy pressing game, which really doesn't suit Snodders.

At the end of the day with Jake and Snodders in the team we weren't getting the result needed, so maybe a completely new approach might turn out to be more effective. It will be interesting to see how things develop.
Click to expand...

Amen.
 
Off topic

Mr S Archer

Stop using you mobile phone in class.

I will have to confiscate it and give you a detention if not.


My two great nieces went to school in Hull
One still does.

Both are doing well so Hull does have some good teachers.

My great friend is a teacher nr Cambridge

He took early retirement because the long hours out side 9am _ 3:30pm was getting ridiculous.

He since has gone on to teach the Naughty excluded kids 3 days a week.

I would not be a teacher IF I was bright enough for double your pay

Good teachers are priceless.

You seem to get angry at people Mr bengals for some reason

Mr S Archer may be one of the good teachers for all you know.

I feel sorry for you Mr.S Archer if you have a class full of mini me's as I must have been a teachers nightmare back in the.day
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber, Chazz Rheinhold, Bengals Tiger and 5 others
Stevielidds1983 said:
Hmmm, I wonder what it could be!! Could it be that he's asking for ridiculous amounts of wages! Could it be that he has dodgy knees and who knows how long he will last! Could it be that his insistence of a 4 year contract knowing about his Knee injury is putting a lot of people off! A lot more to this then people would like to believe
Click to expand...

And he publicly begged - begged - to go to Septic yet they wouldn't touch him with a barge pole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevielidds1983 and Fez
Bengals Tiger said:
'Don't slag teachers off.' In Ull??? In the 21st Century? Are you serious? I currently have various young blood-relatives still living in Ull, whose future, unfortunately, depends upon YOU and your peers. I'm distressed to say I'm not even slightly confident for their future there, and I genuinely hope I can find some way to help them escape to reality. Education is a wonderful thing and, believe me, people like you are not on the 'plus' side of this highly nonlinear equation.
And don't even think about thanking me for pointing out your error; just keep making the same error, forever. Then, one day, you may get on to the Hull City Council. Alongside Garragher. Aaaaawesome.
And don't EVER try to make jokes about the Blitz -- that's waaay beyond bad manners, sonny. I'm sure that many grown-up posters on here lost family members -- fathers, brothers, sons, uncles, granddads, etc. -- during that dreadful time.
You've got a lot of growing up to do, before you should even think about trying to present yourself as a grown-up, kiddo. Now get back to correcting your pupils' spelling errors, if, of course, you can ... IF you agree that spelling and grammar are actually important in the grown-up world.
Click to expand...

As a self proclaimed intelligent man, with an international appreciation of what is wrong with the world, you really do come across as an ignorant and arrogant piece of ****. I find it difficult to understand how anyone with any level of civility and decency can even contemplate 'liking' your post. Very telling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FILEYseadog, Chazz Rheinhold, spesupersydera and 3 others
Hull City AFC (GLP) said:
<laugh><laugh> By all means sell players. As we're selling them to restructure the squad, or as many believe pay off the Allams. Do you not think maximising the sale value of OUR players is in our best interests? It either gives us more money in the transfer market or covers off more of the debt - dependent on what you think the club are doing with funds.

My feeling is we're getting rid of contracted players and bringing in loans - alarm bells ringing. Part of the fee will be used to cover off wages the remainder no doubt trousered by the dim one.

We now have a situation where we'll have lots of players on loan and only 5 can feature on a match day. I think we'll be worse off at the end of the window than we were at the start.
Click to expand...

The transfer window hasn't closed yet so it's a bit early to be worrying about where the money is going.

As far as the loans are concerned, we have 4 players on loan so clearly all of them will be able to feature on match days, even if we were to bring in another loan, every one of them can still play on match days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back