Settle this once and for all?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Did we play a back 3 or a back 4 against Bournemouth?

  • Total voters
    70
Plum said:
Seems to be causing agitation on the MDT!
Click to expand...
Everybody knows it's back 4. One person believed it was back 3, realised their were wrong but continues to reiterate his point as though he's "joking". At least, I think that's what's happening.
 
Cortez91 said:
Everybody knows it's back 4. One person believed it was back 3, realised their were wrong but continues to reiterate his point as though he's "joking". At least, I think that's what's happening.
Click to expand...

It's not what's happening. I don't think I'll bother voting on this.
 
Regardless of the formation played, why does it need pages and pages of Schoolyard style arguments

It's like wading through ******

** (given I've never waded through **** I'm guessing it's like that)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howden Tigress
didnt think it mattered...
at least we didnt have 10 outfield players camped on the edge of our penalty area ala Bruce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djsowtz
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back