I am not convinced by Gouffran at all. Been very very poor of late. I'm also unsure about just playing the same way over and over. I think we have become very predictable. Murphy in a 10 role would be a strange one for me. I don't think I'm being unkind to suggest his technical levels are not exactly spellbinding. Can he thread the passes to feed Gayle? I'm not convinced.
There is no bigger critic of Perez than me. I just think he is one of the more creative talents in the squad and therefore without Shelvey he could be required to provide something different. It is then about how to use him. To me he is made to be part of a front three with less defensive work blunting him. I think him and Ritchie could provide the spark to reignite our season.
Certainly whether 3 or 4 at the back, we need Yedlin and Lazaar wide to inject pace. Anita will have to go into the middle. I just think both him and Hayden are better as holders, meaning 343 or 352 is the way to go. If we play the same old 4321 we will encounter the same problem as with Colback/Hayden. Nobody can thread the pass or move the ball quickly.
If you are playing Murphy I think you have to resign yourself to being a bit more direct. Nothing wrong with that but personally not the way I'd go.
Certainly Hanley has not been great. As one of the better performers in recent years in the championship, you'd have to think he is capable of a lot more given the opportunity.
Had Mitro been fit I may have even dropped Gayle. I know sacrilege to some.
Actually I think we need to step the tactics up a notch. I'd mimic Spurs a bit. They tend to play with a four across the back, but Naughton and Rose are very attack minded; high end versions of Yedlin and Lazaar! But what happens with Spurs is the full backs are encouraged forward, where Eric Dier is then held back to the point of becoming a back three, with their other CB's like Aldereiweld operating as CB/LB. Now we have the personnel, very much, to make that happen - it's about coaching and tactics for me, as well as of course ability.
But where i think we get it wrong is the front 6 players. This 2-3-1 thing doesn't suit our Championship/poor Premiership players, they're all a bit hit and miss - Silva, Willian, Mkhtaryan, De Bruyne, Alli, Eriksen they AIN'T! So we need to pace things up a bit, in my opinion. I'd retain Hayden, but move him central as a real destroyer (Dier's good with the ball too, but his role is really defensive); all too often with Hayden/Colback/Anita we end up with TWO defending and both getting a bit clumsy with it, with no real outlet and being overrun or just with no options. So I'd then go 4-1-2-3 (or just 4-3-3 really).
So in this formation, with Hayden sitting, I'd have Shelvey obviously back in then look to get Vurnon Anita in there alongside him. He's not a great option, and for me that's an area we have to strengthen, but he's busy, he makes himself available and can exploit space better if Shelvey is getting closed down; it also puts us a bit higher up the field and more on the front foot, with emphasis on attacking. Ahead of those two is then an attacking trio of Ritchie, Perez and Gayle. Notice we're not playing wingers, we're playing attackers; crosses from full back will happen, but less often than playing wingers/full-backs. These three should look to work off each other, drop inside, create space up the flanks for full backs as well as run channels for Shelvey.
The only thing we really lose here is a target man; now it's about research and the opposition. If the opposition needs that up against them, then I'd look to switch into the 3-5-2 formation; Hayden drops right into CB (right side), Lascelles middle and Clark left. Shelvey and Anita sit behind Ritchie, Yedlin/Lazaar on the flanks and Murphy/Mitro partner Gayle up top.
In football manager tradition, I'd have these two formations as my preference in this league. 4-3-3 first, and 3-5-2 second.


