The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, you're just posturing when you had ample opportunity to prove him wrong and have continued to be evasive. It's lame but it helps fill your afternoon.

You've jumped in, knowing **** all yet again, and grasping the wrong issue, that you're now trying to drag out. It's a bad habit of yours.

If you want to have your argument, you need to have with stumpy, he's the one making the silly claims he can't back up. It's why he's wriggling.
 
You've jumped in, knowing **** all yet again, and grasping the wrong issue, that you're now trying to drag out. It's a bad habit of yours.

If you want to have your argument, you need to have with stumpy, he's the one making the silly claims he can't back up. It's why he's wriggling.

I could just copy and paste my last post to you. If it helps fill your day you can take that as my reply each time while I'm out.
 
I could just copy and paste my last post to you. If it helps fill your day you can take that as my reply each time while I'm out.

For someone not wanting to drag this nothingness out, you're having a good go, as you regularly do.

You're making a total arse of yourself again in the process. <doh>
 
Snowflakes
I'm just watching an episode of "The World at War"
Before it started there was an announcement: "The programme contains images of war some younger viewers might find upsetting"
My dad fought in France, then North Africa, then Italy, then France and Germany and then Burma. Nobody warned him about what he would see then.
Of course they did. They bloody trained him for it.
TV's carried pre-watershed warnings for decades, too.

The idea that this is new is ridiculous. Remember the campaigns run by that Special Snowflake Mary Whitehouse?
Offended by anything and everything and born in 1910. I'm sure that's different though, for some reason.
 
Of course they did. They bloody trained him for it.
TV's carried pre-watershed warnings for decades, too.

The idea that this is new is ridiculous. Remember the campaigns run by that Special Snowflake Mary Whitehouse?
Offended by anything and everything and born in 1910. I'm sure that's different though, for some reason.

You are right, but most uni kids are snowflakes, easy offended by anything and everything and expect everything handed to them on a plate
 
You are right, but most uni kids are snowflakes, easy offended by anything and everything and expect everything handed to them on a plate
A very small number of uni kids are snowflakes and a section of the media focus on them to push their agenda.
They're irrelevant and have little say or influence over anything, but they talk a lot of ****. Perfect for their detractors.

As for expecting everything to be handed to them on a plate, I'd say that they actually get the opposite.
Paid for education, for example. Removed by the same people that benefited from it.
 
A very small number of uni kids are snowflakes and a section of the media focus on them to push their agenda.
They're irrelevant and have little say or influence over anything, but they talk a lot of ****. Perfect for their detractors.

As for expecting everything to be handed to them on a plate, I'd say that they actually get the opposite.
Paid for education, for example. Removed by the same people that benefited from it.

Because the UK cant afford to pay for them to go to Uni, also too many kids go to Uni and do pointless degrees
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
Because the UK cant afford to pay for them to go to Uni, also too many kids go to Uni and do pointless degrees
Could the UK afford to pay for the degrees of the people that voted to remove that privilege? It did.
If pointless degrees are the issue, then maybe STEM degrees should be the exception?
 
Could the UK afford to pay for the degrees of the people that voted to remove that privilege? It did.
If pointless degrees are the issue, then maybe STEM degrees should be the exception?

I don't think any degree should be free but this cost was taking the piss a bit when I left uni in 2012 and it's just scandalous now. Still, keep the pensioners happy and you'll get re-elected.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.